Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 19 de November de 2024
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Governance in family businesses: essential structures and instruments

Liège Fernandes Vargas, especialista em Direito Societário, autora do artigo sobre governança e continuidade em empresas familiares no blog CPDMA

Corporate governance in family businesses has become increasingly relevant in the Brazilian business landscape, where approximately 90% of companies are under family control. The lack of adequate succession planning and the difficulty of maintaining harmony in family relationships often lead to business failure after the third generation. In this context, creating effective governance mechanisms and implementing formal structures are essential for the continuity and sustainability of these organizations.

Family businesses face the challenge of balancing professional management with family values and traditions. Family governance, structured through the creation of councils, aims to achieve this balance. The Family Council, for example, is a non-corporate body that facilitates communication among family members and assists in conflict resolution, preservation of family values, and succession planning. The Board of Directors, on the other hand, is a deliberative body provided for in the Corporations Law that offers a strategic and impartial view of business management. It is often composed of external members who bring a more technical and professional approach.

In addition to these structures, the use of specific legal instruments is essential to ensure family governance. In this regard, the Shareholders' Agreement—also called a Quotaholders' or Stockholders' Agreement, depending on the legal nature of the company—regulates corporate aspects such as the purchase and sale of shares and voting rights, ensuring predictability in future business decisions. The Family Protocol, also known as the Family Charter, establishes norms of coexistence and responsibilities among family members involved directly or indirectly in the business, creating a structure that minimizes internal conflicts and promotes the continuity of values to be passed down through generations.

For the implementation of these governance structures, companies in the form of holdings (known as family holdings) can be used. Conceptually, a holding can be defined as a legal entity that centralizes the organizational and/or asset control of the family group, either through (i) a pure holding, focused exclusively on managing equity in other companies; (ii) a mixed holding, which also incorporates other business activities; or (iii) an asset holding, which solely manages the family’s assets. These structures facilitate succession planning and asset management, contributing to the perpetuation and preservation of the business, and can even lead to tax burden reduction.

Analyzing the challenges faced by family businesses, one of the main sources of strain in family relationships is the lack of interest from future generations in participating in business management. Recent research indicates that more than 50% of heirs do not wish to be directly involved in the company's administration[1]. In this scenario, it is crucial for family businesses to establish governance mechanisms that allow for the continuity of the business, even if direct management is eventually carried out by external professionals.

At the same time, it is important for family members who are in control and managing the business to create structures that encourage younger generations to participate and understand the family's principles, allowing them to bring perspectives and changes from the contemporary world that can directly impact the longevity of the business, especially those of a technological nature.

 

In this way, by combining all these elements, family corporate governance can be effectively implemented in various structures.

Finally, it should be noted that family businesses often struggle to separate the business context from family relationships, mixing issues from both areas. For these reasons, it is advisable that the implementation also be carried out with the assistance of a consultant or lawyer—an external agent to the family relationship.


[1] Source: KPMG. Available for download in PDF, p. 8. Accessed on: Aug. 25, 2024.

By: Liège Fernandes Vargas
Corporate Law | CPDMA Team

Return

Recent posts

The STJ decides that stock options (option to purchase shares or quotas) cannot be seized.

On November 5th, the 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice ruled, through the judgment of REsp 1841466[1], under the rapporteurship of Minister Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, on the impossibility of seizing stock options. The case focused on the possibility of a third party exercising the right to purchase shares in […]

Read more

Governance in family businesses: essential structures and instruments

A governança corporativa em empresas familiares tem ganhado cada vez mais relevância no cenário empresarial brasileiro, no qual cerca de 90% das empresas possuem controle familiar. A ausência de um planejamento adequado para a sucessão do negócio e a dificuldade de manter a harmonia nas relações familiares, em muitos casos, culminam no fracasso da empresa […]

Read more
Resolution No. 586/2024 of the CNJ and the Future of Agreements in Labor Justice

On 09/30/2024, the National Council of Justice (CNJ) unanimously approved Resolution No. 586 through Normative Act 0005870-16.2024.2.00.0000, which regulates the agreement between employee and employer in the termination of the employment contract, through approval by the Labor Justice system, with full settlement of the contract. In other words, […]

Read more
The Legitimacy of Associations and Foundations to Request Judicial Reorganization and the New Stance of the STJ.

At the beginning of October, the 3rd Panel of the STJ, by majority vote, issued a decision in four special appeals (REsp 2.026.250, REsp 2.036.410, REsp 2.038.048, and REsp 2.155.284), ruling against the active legitimacy of nonprofit foundations to request Judicial Reorganization. This unprecedented decision appears, at first glance, […]

Read more
Government of RS Establishes Recovery Program II: Installment Plan for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection

The Government of the State of Rio Grande do Sul has instituted the Recovery Program II through Decree No. 57,884 of October 22, 2024, with the objective of allowing the installment of tax and non-tax debts for entrepreneurs or business entities under bankruptcy protection, including taxpayers whose bankruptcy […]

Read more
Renegotiation of BRL 60 Billion in Debt for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection Regularized by PGFN

With information from Valor Econômico newspaper. Original article link: http://glo.bo/3NOicuU Since 2020, the Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN) has been advancing negotiations to regularize debts of companies under bankruptcy protection, resulting in the renegotiation of approximately BRL 60 billion. The number of regularized companies has tripled, reaching 30% of cases, thanks to a more collaborative approach from the […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram