Em 3 de julho de 2025, a Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM) publicou as Resoluções CVM 231 e 232, instituindo o regime FÁCIL (Facilitação do Acesso ao Capital e Incentivos às Listagens). A iniciativa visa simplificar o ingresso de Companhias de Menor Porte (CMP) no mercado de capitais brasileiro, promovendo transparência regulatória e estabilidade jurídica, […]
CPDMA BLOG
Category: News
Date: October 10, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team
STJ discusses monetary correction of tax credit
The 1st Section of the Superior Court of Justice began to analyze this Thursday (10/10) the definition of the initial term incidence of monetary correction in the administrative request for reimbursement of tax credits.
The trial was suspended after the Minister Regina Helena Costa requested a view. So far, only the rapporteur, Minister Sérgio Kukina, has voted to establish a more beneficial initial framework for the National Treasury.
"Law 11,457/2007 determines that the Federal Revenue Service has 360 days to issue an administrative decision on requests for reimbursement. In addition, precedent 411 of the STJ determines that monetary correction is due to the IPI credit when there is opposition to its use resulting from illegitimate resistance from the tax authorities", said the minister.
Minister Sérgio Kukina proposed to establish the following thesis: "The initial term of the monetary correction of reimbursement of excess book-entry tax subject to the non-cumulative regime occurs only after the period of 360 days for analysis of the administrative request by the tax authorities".
The issue to be resolved in the judgment is described as "definition of the initial term of the incidence of monetary correction in the reimbursement of book-entry tax credits: the date of the protocol of the administrative request of the taxpayer or the day following the expiration of the period of 360 days provided for in article 24 of Law 11.457/2007”.
Tax benefit
In this case, the National Treasury argues that the Selic rate should only apply from the 361st day after the protocol. This is because, in the prosecutor's view, the book-entry credit is a tax benefit and monetary correction is only applied in exceptional cases in which there is illegitimate resistance from the tax authorities.
For the Treasury, a period of one year is reasonable and adequate for the Internal Revenue Service to analyze whether the administrative requests are fair and whether there is a right to reimbursement.
Taxpayers defend the monetary correction of the amounts from the date of filing the administrative request. There are, according to the STJ, at least 345 cases in court on the subject.
Source: Gabriela Coelho via Conjur.
Recent posts
CVM lança o regime FÁCIL para ampliar o acesso de empresas de menor porte ao mercado de capitais
Read more
Thayse Bortolomiol takes over as head of the Business Restructuring Area at CPDMA.
Attorney Thayse Bortolomiol takes over the coordination of CPDMA's Business Restructuring area, maintaining the technical and strategic standard that has built the firm's reputation in this field and continuing one of its most prominent areas of practice. With eight years of experience at CPDMA, Thayse has been directly involved in key initiatives led by the firm, gaining […]
Abuse of control power in corporations: limits and consequences
Read more
Nas sociedades anônimas, a figura do acionista controlador desempenha papel central na definição dos rumos estratégicos da companhia. Detentor do poder de eleger a maioria dos administradores e de influenciar as deliberações sociais, esse acionista possui uma posição de destaque que, embora legítima, deve ser exercida dentro dos limites legais e em consonância com os […]
STJ recognizes extrajudicial exclusion of partner based on private instrument, without registration with the Board of Trade
Read more
In a recent decision, the Third Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) upheld the extrajudicial exclusion of a partner based on a private instrument signed by all members of the company, even without registration with the Board of Trade.[1]
In the case under review, after the company's formation and registration, the partners signed a document called a "statute," [...]
STF suspends proceedings on the legality of service provision contracts across the country
The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has decided to suspend, nationwide, all legal proceedings that question the legality of service provision contracts, commonly known as “pejotização”. The decision, issued by Justice Gilmar Mendes, aims to standardize the interpretation on the matter and ensure legal certainty. The STF recognized the general repercussion of the issue when it […]
CPDMA's role was decisive in the Supreme Federal Court's ruling reaffirming the case law on the use of legal entities in labor relations.
Uma importante decisão proferida recentemente pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), a partir de atuação da equipe trabalhista Cesar Peres Dulac Müller Advogados, trouxe novamente à tona a relevância da observância aos precedentes vinculantes da Corte em matéria trabalhista, especialmente quanto à licitude de formas alternativas de contratação, como a prestação de serviços por pessoa jurídica — prática […]
English 
Português do Brasil 
Español