Em 3 de julho de 2025, a Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM) publicou as Resoluções CVM 231 e 232, instituindo o regime FÁCIL (Facilitação do Acesso ao Capital e Incentivos às Listagens). A iniciativa visa simplificar o ingresso de Companhias de Menor Porte (CMP) no mercado de capitais brasileiro, promovendo transparência regulatória e estabilidade jurídica, […]
CPDMA BLOG
Category: News
Date: March 21, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team
STJ maintains fine on company that sells advance tickets
The 2nd panel of the Superior Court of Justice unanimously denied, this Thursday (21/3), an appeal in which Tickets for Fun intended to reverse a fine of more than R$ 1 million for violations of the Consumer Protection Code applied by Procon Sao Paulo.
In the session, the collegiate maintained a previous decision of the Court of Justice of São Paulo. The TJ concluded that the advance sale of tickets to certain consumers, holders of specific credit cards, prevents other interested parties from competing with equal conditions, not being allowed to choose any place or seat at the show or, even, opt for tickets with more affordable values.
The rapporteur, Minister Mauro Campbell, stated that in order to reject the conclusions adopted by the TJ and accept the company's thesis of the inexistence of abusive practice, "it would be essential to revolve the factual and evidential content already analyzed, which is prohibited by the precedent 7 of the Court , which prohibits the re-examination of facts and evidence".
"In relation to the proportionality of the arbitrated fine, also questioned by the company, in order to assess the issue, it would be essential to analyze Procon's ordinance 26/06, and the interpretation of the constant mathematical formula, since such a procedure is impossible since the administrative act does not fall under the concept of Federal law or treaty", he explained.
Illegal Fee
Last week, the 3rd class of the Court ruled on the illegality of the convenience fee for tickets purchased over the internet in a lawsuit involving Ingresso Rápido, filed by a Consumer Protection Association of Rio Grande do Sul. The collegiate also determined the reimbursement of the company's clients since 2008, five years before the lawsuit was filed in the judiciary.
All consumers who can prove payment of the fee, regardless of whether they are part of the association, will be able to qualify for reimbursement, after the action is completed.
Source: Gabriela Coelho via Conjur.
Recent posts
CVM lança o regime FÁCIL para ampliar o acesso de empresas de menor porte ao mercado de capitais
Read more
Thayse Bortolomiol takes over as head of the Business Restructuring Area at CPDMA.
Attorney Thayse Bortolomiol takes over the coordination of CPDMA's Business Restructuring area, maintaining the technical and strategic standard that has built the firm's reputation in this field and continuing one of its most prominent areas of practice. With eight years of experience at CPDMA, Thayse has been directly involved in key initiatives led by the firm, gaining […]
Abuse of control power in corporations: limits and consequences
Read more
Nas sociedades anônimas, a figura do acionista controlador desempenha papel central na definição dos rumos estratégicos da companhia. Detentor do poder de eleger a maioria dos administradores e de influenciar as deliberações sociais, esse acionista possui uma posição de destaque que, embora legítima, deve ser exercida dentro dos limites legais e em consonância com os […]
STJ recognizes extrajudicial exclusion of partner based on private instrument, without registration with the Board of Trade
Read more
In a recent decision, the Third Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) upheld the extrajudicial exclusion of a partner based on a private instrument signed by all members of the company, even without registration with the Board of Trade.[1]
In the case under review, after the company's formation and registration, the partners signed a document called a "statute," [...]
STF suspends proceedings on the legality of service provision contracts across the country
The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has decided to suspend, nationwide, all legal proceedings that question the legality of service provision contracts, commonly known as “pejotização”. The decision, issued by Justice Gilmar Mendes, aims to standardize the interpretation on the matter and ensure legal certainty. The STF recognized the general repercussion of the issue when it […]
CPDMA's role was decisive in the Supreme Federal Court's ruling reaffirming the case law on the use of legal entities in labor relations.
Uma importante decisão proferida recentemente pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), a partir de atuação da equipe trabalhista Cesar Peres Dulac Müller Advogados, trouxe novamente à tona a relevância da observância aos precedentes vinculantes da Corte em matéria trabalhista, especialmente quanto à licitude de formas alternativas de contratação, como a prestação de serviços por pessoa jurídica — prática […]
English 
Português do Brasil 
Español