Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 29 de May de 2024
Posted by: CPDMA Team

The extent of insurance cover in floods

Cobertura securitária por Felipe Meneghello Machado - Equipe CPDMA

The rains that have hit Rio Grande do Sul in recent weeks have destroyed farms, properties and vehicles. Even if they are insured, car or property owners should check their policies to see if they can get compensation.

Basic car and home insurance does not usually cover floods. Electricity, fire and lightning are the most basic types of home insurance. For vehicles, the most affordable policies cover theft and robbery. For coverages not covered by the policies, the insured will end up paying for the losses on their own, since brokers and insurers don't usually make their coverages flexible in the event of disasters.

The additional cover could be requested at the time of contracting for an additional price. If the insured has chosen not to take out optional cover, there is no possibility of insurers making payments for cover not taken out.

The floods caused further inestimable damage, with the declaration of public calamity in more than 90% of the municipalities in Rio Grande do Sul. Around 2 million inhabitants were affected. As if that weren't enough, policyholders are still at risk of not being entitled to compensation due to the nature of the disaster.

There is a trend in the insurance market to require additional cover for risks linked to the action of water, such as infiltration, flooding and inundation. Given the history of flooding in Brazil's major urban centers, insurers often classify these situations as exceptional risks. This type of cover is available through an additional contract.

The lack of clarity in insurance contracts is also seen as a problem. Exclusion clauses are the points to be analyzed in order to identify any unavailable cover in the contracts. Insured people may find it difficult to compare types of insurance, buying the cheapest, usually without cover for flooding, because it is difficult to understand the difference.

In the case of property, business and home insurance, you need to take out specific cover to protect yourself against the risk of flooding. Home insurance protects the insured's assets and can cover both the structure of the property and the goods that furnish the home. Housing insurance protects the financial institution that financed the property. In the event of the insured's disability or death, housing insurance guarantees that the financial institution will receive the remaining installments and, therefore, the entire amount financed. This insurance has become compulsory for real estate financing under the Housing Finance System.

The clause that defines the maximum amounts of cover must always be observed, as there is always a limit to the amount of compensation, i.e. if the insured's loss is greater, the insurer will only compensate up to the cash limit defined in the policy.

Consumers who have been affected should contact their insurance company and ask for a copy of the policy in order to register the claim. It is important that the insured informs the company that they live in the area affected by the rains and asks if there are any initial protocols to be followed.

If compensation is denied, the way forward is to file a collection action. The insurer is obliged to justify the reason for any denial, so that the insured can decide whether to pursue the claim in court.

The different interpretations of the concepts of inundation, floods and overflows make it difficult, at first, to objectively define the possibility of compensation.

Due to the nature of the disaster, it is possible that the population in the affected areas will have greater difficulties with insurers to protect their assets. Insurers must consider that insured assets will experience recurring problems, with the possibility of raising rates in order to continue taking on the risk. Recent events show that the region has become a risk area, and it is likely that rates will increase, especially for home insurance.

Finally, if there is no specific clause on floods or bad weather, it would only be possible to consider some kind of compensation if there is proof that the offer made by the insurer created the expectation that this kind of event would be covered.

By: Felipe Meneghello Machado

Civil Law | CPDMA Team

Return

Recent posts

STJ recognizes extrajudicial exclusion of partner based on private instrument, without registration with the Board of Trade

In a recent decision, the Third Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) upheld the extrajudicial exclusion of a partner based on a private instrument signed by all members of the company, even without registration with the Board of Trade.[1]

In the case under review, after the company's formation and registration, the partners signed a document called a "statute," [...]

Read more

STF suspends proceedings on the legality of service provision contracts across the country

The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has decided to suspend, nationwide, all legal proceedings that question the legality of service provision contracts, commonly known as “pejotização”. The decision, issued by Justice Gilmar Mendes, aims to standardize the interpretation on the matter and ensure legal certainty. The STF recognized the general repercussion of the issue when it […]

Read more

CPDMA's role was decisive in the Supreme Federal Court's ruling reaffirming the case law on the use of legal entities in labor relations.

Uma importante decisão proferida recentemente pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), a partir de atuação da equipe trabalhista Cesar Peres Dulac Müller Advogados, trouxe novamente à tona a relevância da observância aos precedentes vinculantes da Corte em matéria trabalhista, especialmente quanto à licitude de formas alternativas de contratação, como a prestação de serviços por pessoa jurídica — prática […]

Read more

Annual meeting for accounts review

The annual holding of the Ordinary General Meeting (OGM) for the accountability of the administrators is a legal requirement provided for in Law No. 6,404/1976 (Brazilian Corporations Law), specifically in Articles 132 and following. This provision establishes that the OGM must take place within the first four (4) months following the end of the fiscal year, usually by […]

Read more

The Full Bench of the Superior Labor Court rules on new binding precedents

The Full Bench of the Superior Labor Court, in a session held this Monday (24), established legal theses on new topics, as part of a procedure to reaffirm its jurisprudence. These are matters that, as they are already settled, were submitted to the repetitive appeals procedure to define a binding legal thesis. The establishment of qualified precedents has a direct impact […]

Read more
Thomas Dulac Müller discusses third-party liability in bankruptcy at TMA Brasil event in Porto Alegre

On March 18, 2025, at the Hotel Laghetto Stilo Higienópolis, Thomas Dulac Müller, a lawyer and expert in corporate restructuring, participated in the panel "Third-Party Liability in Bankruptcy", sharing his expertise alongside top industry specialists. The discussion provided strategic insights into the legal implications of bankruptcy for third parties involved in insolvency proceedings. […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram