Termination without cause of the employment contract. Maintenance of the potestative right: validation by the STF
The plenary of the Federal Supreme Court (STF), in the judgment of ADI 1625, finalized on May 26 of this year, validated - by majority vote - the presidential decree that withdrew Brazil from Convention 158 of the International Labor Organization (ILO), which prohibits unjustified dismissals in adhering countries.
The international norm establishes that the dismissal of employees, in countries that adhere to the agreement, can only occur if there is a justified cause related to their capacity or behavior, or based on the operational needs of the company, establishment or service.
This norm had been suspended in Brazil since 1996, due to a complaint presented to the ILO by the then president Fernando Henrique Cardoso, through decree 2,100/96.
The presidential act was issued months after the National Congress approved the country's adherence to the convention.
Shortly after the publication of the decree, in early 1997, the National Confederation of Agricultural Workers (Contag) and the Central Workers Union (CUT) filed a lawsuit with the STF, claiming that, before taking effect, the country's withdrawal from the convention would necessarily have to go through the Legislative Branch.
The majority of the STF Justices agreed that the President of the Republic cannot, henceforth, withdraw Brazil from international treaties by decree, since if adherence to these international norms requires legislative endorsement, so does withdrawal.
However, for the sake of legal security, the STF fixed the understanding that it could not act to annul the act signed by Fernando Henrique Cardoso, which in practice keeps Brazil out of ILO convention 158.
In this sense, in brief synthesis, the employer's right of power was maintained, especially regarding the unjustified rupture (dismissal without cause) of the employment contract.
The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has begun the trial of a crucial issue for business law and judicial recovery in Brazil: the possibility of applying a discount on labor claims and creating subclasses within this category. The case under review involves the judicial recovery of the company Concreserv, which established a 90% discount on amounts exceeding 25 […]
Companies with 100 or more employees can now submit information for the Salary Transparency Report from February 3 to February 28, 2025, through the Emprega Brasil portal, in the employers' section. On the portal, companies must report whether they have a job and salary plan or a career plan, policies to encourage the hiring of women (such as Black women, women with disabilities, victims of violence, heads of households, and LGBTQIA+), actions to promote women to management and leadership positions, programs to support the sharing of family responsibilities, as well as the salary criteria for career progression.
In recent months, several Commercial Registries in Brazil have begun requiring the publication of acts related to mergers, spin-offs, and incorporations of companies, as established in the Civil Code (Articles 1,122 and 1,152, §1) and the Corporate Law (Articles 227, §3, 228, §3, and 229, §4). Although these obligations were already stipulated by law, many […]
The National Council of Fiscal Policy - CONFAZ, aiming to facilitate the regularization of taxpayers' tax debts, has authorized the implementation of a program for the settlement and installment payment of ICMS debts in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, whether or not they are registered as outstanding debt, assessed, or subject to legal proceedings. The program provides for a […]
Reiteramos nosso compromisso contínuo em oferecer serviços jurídicos com excelência e segurança. Diante disso, alertamos sobre uma situação delicada que tem ocorrido no setor jurídico: recentemente, tomamos conhecimento de tentativas de golpes direcionadas a clientes de escritórios de advocacia. Gostaríamos de tranquilizá-los, assegurando que todas as suas informações processuais e pessoais permanecem integralmente protegidas. Esses […]
On November 5th, the 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice ruled, through the judgment of REsp 1841466[1], under the rapporteurship of Minister Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, on the impossibility of seizing stock options. The case focused on the possibility of a third party exercising the right to purchase shares in […]
This website uses cookies to improve your experience as you browse the website. Cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored in your browser as they are essential for the basic functionality of the website to function. We also use third-party cookies, which help us analyze and understand how you use this website. Cookies will be stored on your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt out of cookies. However, disabling some cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Functional cookies help in performing certain functionality such as sharing website content on social media platforms, collecting feedback and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information about the metrics of the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertising cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant advertisements and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors to websites and collect information to deliver personalized advertisements.
Necessary cookies are those that are absolutely essential for the proper functioning of the website. These cookies guarantee basic functionality and security features of the website, anonymously.