Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: April 6, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Judicial recovery is slow in São Paulo

The Justice of São Paulo takes about 57 days to grant a request for judicial recovery. Companies, on the other hand, need a median period of 517 days to approve a recovery plan at the meeting and three years to leave the Judiciary (monitoring period). 

The numbers show that, on average, a recovery process is slow and even more time-consuming when considering the deadlines set by Law No. 11,101, of 2005, which deals with the country's recoveries and bankruptcies. Even so, the mechanism is considered efficient by experts.

The data are part of the "2nd Phase of the Insolvency Observatory", a study developed by the Nucleus of Insolvency Proceedings Studies (Nepi) of PUC-SP and the Brazilian Association of Jurimetry (ABJ). The survey analyzed 906 cases distributed between January 2010 and July 2017, in the two specialized courts in the capital and interior of the state.

For the professor at PUC-SP and research coordinator, judge Marcelo Sacramone, in relation to the deadlines seen in the survey, the granting of a request for judicial recovery is still very long. "The average of 57 days is very time consuming. During this period, the company can lose assets", he says.

Another data from the study shows that companies take well over 180 days to get a recovery plan approved. This is the period of protection, granted by law, during which companies cannot be charged and enforced. After this period, the protection in theory would cease to exist. Today, however, jurisprudence accepts extending the "shielding" time until the plan is approved at a creditors' meeting.

"The numbers show that the period of 180 days is not reasonable to negotiate a plan and usually takes twice as long," says the study. According to Ivo Waisberg, who is also a professor at PUC-SP and coordinator of the study, the ideal would be for the assembly to be convened shortly after presenting the plan to the judge (60 days after publication of the decision with approval) as a way of reducing these deadlines.

According to the study, the median time until the final deliberation on the plan is 517 days. In common courts, the period corresponds to 567 days. In the specialized branches of the capital, the time is 407 days.

As for the plans, of those taken to deliberation, 72% were approved. Already 17% of the companies were declared bankrupt before the first meeting of creditors took place.

The president of ABJ and also coordinator of the study, Marcelo Guedes Nunes, says that from the survey it is clear that the approved recovery plans, in general, are aggressive. According to him, there are discounts of up to 80%, payment terms of 20 years, without interest and correction by the Referential Rate (TR).

"The creditors only accept these conditions because bankruptcy is a horrible alternative, which does not pay anyone. Research shows that to solve the problems of judicial recovery we have to improve bankruptcy", says Nunes.

Among the payment conditions evaluated, the shortest are labor conditions. Present in 84.5% of the plans, they took an average of one year to settle.

Nunes adds that from the survey it was possible to verify that the law has a bias against small business owners. According to the coordinator, they represent more than 90% of active companies in the country, but appear only in 30% of recovery requests. "It's strange because they are more vulnerable to crises, but they don't see the law as a solution to their difficulties."

In addition to these points, the study also addresses issues such as the remuneration of administrators and the use of prior expertise in the process. Statistician Fernando Corrêa is also one of the observatory's coordinators.

Source: Zínia Baeta via Valor Econômico.


Recent posts

Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.

On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]

Read more
The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]

Read more
Business position on the recent STF decision that ruled that it is constitutional for trade unions to charge assistance contributions

Recently, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) unanimously ruled that unions can collect an assistance contribution, including from non-member employees, in ARE 1.18.459 (Topic 935 of the General Repercussion), as long as the worker is guaranteed the right to object, establishing the following thesis: "it is constitutional to establish, by agreement or [...]

Read more
The new chapter in the legal dispute involving the term "HELLES", registered as a 'trademark'.

Recalling the case... It all started at the beginning of 2019, when the brewery Fassbier gave extrajudicial notice to a series of breweries in Rio Grande do Sul for the alleged misuse of the term HELLES, claiming to have exclusive use of the expression, given that the word was registered as a trademark. Not satisfied with [...]

Read more
Suspension of labor executions against companies in the same economic group

In a recent decision, the STF suspended the processing of labor executions that discuss the inclusion, in the execution phase, of a company that is part of an economic group that did not participate in the knowledge process. In labor proceedings, when the execution phase is reached and the main debtor does not have enough assets to pay the debt, many [...]

Read more
STJ decides that the legal personality of a civil association can be disregarded, but limits liability to the directors

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) [1] dismissed a special appeal filed by the directors of a civil association, which had its legal personality disregarded in a case involving the improper use of a trademark. The Court, in a judgment drafted by Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze, held that the disregard of [...]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram