Em 3 de julho de 2025, a Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM) publicou as Resoluções CVM 231 e 232, instituindo o regime FÁCIL (Facilitação do Acesso ao Capital e Incentivos às Listagens). A iniciativa visa simplificar o ingresso de Companhias de Menor Porte (CMP) no mercado de capitais brasileiro, promovendo transparência regulatória e estabilidade jurídica, […]
CPDMA BLOG
Category: News
Date: April 15, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team
Moraes orders Crusoé and O Antagonista to withdraw a report that quotes Toffoli from the air
According to the minister, the article “The friend of my father's friend” has “clear abuse in the content”.
Crusoé magazine and the website O Antagonista received this Monday, 15th, an order from Minister Alexandre de Moraes to remove the article “The friend of my father’s friend” from the air, for “clear abuse in the content”.
See the decision. The report is based on a document from the Lava Jato operation, in which the contractor Marcelo Odebrecht allegedly said that the phrase “friend of my father's friend”, in an e-mail, referred to the president of the Supreme Court, Dias Toffoli.
Moraes presides over an investigation to investigate the existence of fake news “that affect the honor and security of the Federal Supreme Court, its members and family members, extrapolating freedom of expression”.
According to the minister, President Toffoli himself authorized, on Friday, the 12th, the investigation of articles published by the publications. When determining the removal of the news, Moraes says that the “seriousness of the offenses fired at the president” even provoked the action of the PGR, which clarified in a note that it had not received information that would have been delivered by Marcelo Odebrecht in which he states that the description “friend of my father's friend” refers to the president of the STF.
“Obviously, the clarification made by the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC makes false the statements published in the article “The friend of my father's friend”, in a typical example of fake news - which requires the intervention of the Judiciary, because, once again, the full constitutional protection of the expression of opinion (positive aspect) does not constitute an exemption clause from possible liability for injurious and defamatory publications, which, however, must always be analyzed a posteriori, never as a prior and generic restriction on freedom of expression.”
If Moraes' order is not complied with, the penalty is a daily fine of R$ 100 thousand.
Source: Migalhas Portal.
Recent posts
CVM lança o regime FÁCIL para ampliar o acesso de empresas de menor porte ao mercado de capitais
Read more
Thayse Bortolomiol takes over as head of the Business Restructuring Area at CPDMA.
Attorney Thayse Bortolomiol takes over the coordination of CPDMA's Business Restructuring area, maintaining the technical and strategic standard that has built the firm's reputation in this field and continuing one of its most prominent areas of practice. With eight years of experience at CPDMA, Thayse has been directly involved in key initiatives led by the firm, gaining […]
Abuse of control power in corporations: limits and consequences
Read more
Nas sociedades anônimas, a figura do acionista controlador desempenha papel central na definição dos rumos estratégicos da companhia. Detentor do poder de eleger a maioria dos administradores e de influenciar as deliberações sociais, esse acionista possui uma posição de destaque que, embora legítima, deve ser exercida dentro dos limites legais e em consonância com os […]
STJ recognizes extrajudicial exclusion of partner based on private instrument, without registration with the Board of Trade
Read more
In a recent decision, the Third Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) upheld the extrajudicial exclusion of a partner based on a private instrument signed by all members of the company, even without registration with the Board of Trade.[1]
In the case under review, after the company's formation and registration, the partners signed a document called a "statute," [...]
STF suspends proceedings on the legality of service provision contracts across the country
The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has decided to suspend, nationwide, all legal proceedings that question the legality of service provision contracts, commonly known as “pejotização”. The decision, issued by Justice Gilmar Mendes, aims to standardize the interpretation on the matter and ensure legal certainty. The STF recognized the general repercussion of the issue when it […]
CPDMA's role was decisive in the Supreme Federal Court's ruling reaffirming the case law on the use of legal entities in labor relations.
Uma importante decisão proferida recentemente pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), a partir de atuação da equipe trabalhista Cesar Peres Dulac Müller Advogados, trouxe novamente à tona a relevância da observância aos precedentes vinculantes da Corte em matéria trabalhista, especialmente quanto à licitude de formas alternativas de contratação, como a prestação de serviços por pessoa jurídica — prática […]
English 
Português do Brasil 
Español