Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 27 de October de 2023
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Special labor payment plan: a strategy to give companies more breathing space.

Imagem de Douglas Freitas que ilustra o seu artigo sobre direito trabalhista.

Labor enforcement is the phase of the process where the necessary acts take place to pay the credits or obligations recognized in the sentence or judgment, as well as those resulting from unfulfilled agreements.

The rites governing the execution phase in labor proceedings are regulated in the Consolidation of Labor Laws, in its Chapter V, as set out in articles 876 to 892.

The so-called forced execution, however, does not always achieve its objectives in the best way, especially when the debtor is the defendant in several lawsuits of the same nature - the attachable assets are limited and the multiplicity of executions ends up resulting in a simple race by creditors in search of these assets.

In order to prevent the frustration of executions and, to a certain extent, the unfeasibility of the debtor's activity, in February 2018 the Superior Labor Court made it possible to implement the Special Labor Payment Plan (PEPT), through the Provision CGJT : No. 1 of February 9, 2018. Subsequently, the provision was revoked due to the publication of new provisions on the Plan, as established in CGJT Provision No. 01 of August 19, 2022, currently in force. 

The Special Labor Payment Plan (PEPT) aims to give effect to court decisions and fulfill the obligations contracted by the debtor party, while at the same time enabling the continuity of the company's economic activity, with the equitable payment in installments of labor debts by large debtors in favor of the collectivity of creditors. 

The request to implement the Special Labor Payment Plan is made directly to the Corregidor of the competent Regional Court.

For consideration by the competent TRT, it is necessary to present the consolidated Payment Plan, including the estimated interest and monetary correction until it is fully complied with, and the payment may be set at a variable period and amount, respecting the maximum period of six years for the debt to be fully paid. It is important to note that payment requirements and deadlines may vary according to each TRT's own ordinance. 

The purpose of the PEPT is to include all the cases in the definitive execution phase listed when the application for the Plan is submitted, and it must encompass the debtor's total consolidated debt on that date. It is also permissible to make an express request for the inclusion of cases in the definitive execution phase that were initiated after the PEPT was granted, and it is up to the Regional Ombudsman's Office to assess the request. 

Once the proposal has been submitted and the PEPT has been set up, the Regional Internal Affairs Office must submit its decision on the matter to the Full Court or Special Court Body. As soon as the plan is approved by the competent body, enforcement is suspended and any constrictive measures in the cases listed in the PEPT are prohibited, including any requests to open an Incident of Disregard of Legal Personality to redirect enforcement to the company's partners or directors. In other words, the plan suspends the execution of seizure warrants and orders to block amounts in the processes included, and also suspends auctions and auctions of assets seized in these processes.

Therefore, the Special Labor Payment Plan is an effective alternative for halting foreclosures, i.e. stopping the enforcement of expropriatory measures, both against the company and its partners or directors, with the aim of settling debts on a scheduled basis. Thus, the plan benefits the debtor company, which will be able to achieve financial reorganization, as well as the creditor parties, given the predictability of receiving this credit, as set out in the Plan.

By: Douglas Moraes de Freitas

Labor Law | CPDMA Team

Return

Recent posts

The STJ decides that stock options (option to purchase shares or quotas) cannot be seized.

On November 5th, the 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice ruled, through the judgment of REsp 1841466[1], under the rapporteurship of Minister Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, on the impossibility of seizing stock options. The case focused on the possibility of a third party exercising the right to purchase shares in […]

Read more
Governance in family businesses: essential structures and instruments

Corporate governance in family businesses has been gaining increasing relevance in the Brazilian business landscape, where approximately 90% of companies are family-controlled. The lack of adequate planning for business succession and the difficulty in maintaining harmony in family relationships often lead to the company’s failure […]

Read more
Resolution No. 586/2024 of the CNJ and the Future of Agreements in Labor Justice

On 09/30/2024, the National Council of Justice (CNJ) unanimously approved Resolution No. 586 through Normative Act 0005870-16.2024.2.00.0000, which regulates the agreement between employee and employer in the termination of the employment contract, through approval by the Labor Justice system, with full settlement of the contract. In other words, […]

Read more
The Legitimacy of Associations and Foundations to Request Judicial Reorganization and the New Stance of the STJ.

At the beginning of October, the 3rd Panel of the STJ, by majority vote, issued a decision in four special appeals (REsp 2.026.250, REsp 2.036.410, REsp 2.038.048, and REsp 2.155.284), ruling against the active legitimacy of nonprofit foundations to request Judicial Reorganization. This unprecedented decision appears, at first glance, […]

Read more
Government of RS Establishes Recovery Program II: Installment Plan for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection

The Government of the State of Rio Grande do Sul has instituted the Recovery Program II through Decree No. 57,884 of October 22, 2024, with the objective of allowing the installment of tax and non-tax debts for entrepreneurs or business entities under bankruptcy protection, including taxpayers whose bankruptcy […]

Read more
Renegotiation of BRL 60 Billion in Debt for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection Regularized by PGFN

With information from Valor Econômico newspaper. Original article link: http://glo.bo/3NOicuU Since 2020, the Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN) has been advancing negotiations to regularize debts of companies under bankruptcy protection, resulting in the renegotiation of approximately BRL 60 billion. The number of regularized companies has tripled, reaching 30% of cases, thanks to a more collaborative approach from the […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram