The National Council of Fiscal Policy - CONFAZ, aiming to facilitate the regularization of taxpayers' tax debts, has authorized the implementation of a program for the settlement and installment payment of ICMS debts in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, whether or not they are registered as outstanding debt, assessed, or subject to legal proceedings. The program provides for a […]
CPDMA BLOG
Category: News
Date: April 19, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team
STF can define PIS and Confis calculation on import
The Federal Supreme Court (STF) may judge on Wednesday two issues of general repercussion. One of them will define whether ICMS and other contributions should be included in the calculation of PIS and Cofins charged on imports. The other will decide whether charging ICMS on piped water is constitutional.
The process over PIS and Cofins on imports is the extraordinary resource of the Rio Grande do Sul paint importer Vernicitec. It contests the constitutionality of Law No. 10,865, of 2004. The rule established the collection of PIS and Cofins on imports from 2005 onwards.
The company managed to win in the lower courts. In the STF, it has a favorable vote by the retired minister Ellen Gracie.
The extraordinary resource that discusses the taxation of piped water is from the government of Rio de Janeiro. He contests the decision of the 8th Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of the State of Rio de Janeiro (TJ-RJ), which decided not to levy ICMS, considering that the supply of piped water is an essential public service, within the competence of the Public Power.
In September, the Supreme Court began to analyze the case. The first vote, by Minister Dias Toffoli, prevented the collection. In his view, piped water cannot be considered a commodity, avoiding the incidence of the tax. The trial was interrupted by Minister Luiz Fux's request for a view.
Source: Value.
Recent posts
RS authorized to implement ICMS settlement and installment payment with reduction of interest and fines
Atenção às tentativas de golpes utilizando o nome Cesar Peres Dullac Müller Advogados
Read more
Reiteramos nosso compromisso contínuo em oferecer serviços jurídicos com excelência e segurança. Diante disso, alertamos sobre uma situação delicada que tem ocorrido no setor jurídico: recentemente, tomamos conhecimento de tentativas de golpes direcionadas a clientes de escritórios de advocacia. Gostaríamos de tranquilizá-los, assegurando que todas as suas informações processuais e pessoais permanecem integralmente protegidas. Esses […]
The STJ decides that stock options (option to purchase shares or quotas) cannot be seized.
Read more
On November 5th, the 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice ruled, through the judgment of REsp 1841466[1], under the rapporteurship of Minister Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, on the impossibility of seizing stock options. The case focused on the possibility of a third party exercising the right to purchase shares in […]
Governance in family businesses: essential structures and instruments
Read more
Corporate governance in family businesses has been gaining increasing relevance in the Brazilian business landscape, where approximately 90% of companies are family-controlled. The lack of adequate planning for business succession and the difficulty in maintaining harmony in family relationships often lead to the company’s failure […]
Resolution No. 586/2024 of the CNJ and the Future of Agreements in Labor Justice
Read more
On 09/30/2024, the National Council of Justice (CNJ) unanimously approved Resolution No. 586 through Normative Act 0005870-16.2024.2.00.0000, which regulates the agreement between employee and employer in the termination of the employment contract, through approval by the Labor Justice system, with full settlement of the contract. In other words, […]
The Legitimacy of Associations and Foundations to Request Judicial Reorganization and the New Stance of the STJ.
Read more
At the beginning of October, the 3rd Panel of the STJ, by majority vote, issued a decision in four special appeals (REsp 2.026.250, REsp 2.036.410, REsp 2.038.048, and REsp 2.155.284), ruling against the active legitimacy of nonprofit foundations to request Judicial Reorganization. This unprecedented decision appears, at first glance, […]
English 
Português do Brasil 
Español