STF decides that collective rule that restricts labor rights is constitutional
STF decides that collective rule that restricts labor law is constitutional. The Court observed, however, that the reduction of rights by Collective Agreements or Conventions must respect the guarantees constitutionally guaranteed to workers.
The Federal Supreme Court decided that Collective Bargaining Agreements or Agreements that limit or suppress labor rights are valid, provided that a minimum civilizing level is ensured to the worker. By majority vote, the collegiate granted the Extraordinary Appeal with Agravo (ARE) 1121633, with recognized general repercussion (Theme 1.046).
In the specific case, the decision handed down by the Superior Labor Court was questioned, which had ruled out the application of a collective rule that provided for the provision, by the employing company, of transportation for employees to travel to work and the suppression of payment for travel time. The reason for the decision was the fact that the company is located in a place of difficult access and that the public transport schedule is incompatible with the working day.
In the appeal, the employing company argued that, by denying validity to the clause, the TST would have exceeded the constitutional principle of the prevalence of collective bargaining.
In the trial, the vote of Justice Gilmar Mendes (rapporteur) prevailed in favor of the appeal. He stated that the jurisprudence of the STF recognizes the validity of a collective labor agreement or convention that provides for the reduction of labor rights.
The minister considered, however, that this suppression or reduction must, in any case, respect the unavailable rights, guaranteed constitutionally.
As a rule, the clauses cannot violate a minimum civilizing level, composed, in general terms, by the constitutional norms, by the norms of international treaties and conventions incorporated into Brazilian law and by the norms that, even infra-constitutional, ensure minimum guarantees of citizenship to workers.
about the hours on the road, the subject of the case under debate, the minister stated that, according to the jurisprudence of the STF, the issue is directly linked to salary and working hours, themes in relation to which the Constitution authorizes the elaboration of collective labor norms (item XIII and XIV of article 7 of the Federal Constitution).
He was accompanied by ministers André Mendonça, Nunes Marques, Alexandre de Moraes, Luís Roberto Barroso and Dias Toffoli and by minister Cármen Lúcia. Minister Edson Fachin and Minister Rosa Weber were defeated, who voted for the dismissal of the appeal. In Fachin's assessment, considering that the discussion of the case involves the right to overtime (on the road), provided for in article 7, items XIII and XVI, of the Constitution, it is inadmissible for collective bargaining to override the will of the constituent legislator.
Thus, the established thesis was as follows: “Collective agreements and conventions are constitutional which, when considering the negotiated sectoral adequacy, agree on limitations or departures from labor rights, regardless of the specified explanation of compensatory advantages, provided that absolutely unavailable rights are respected”.(1)
STF decides that collective rule that restricts labor law is constitutional. The Court observed, however, that the reduction of rights by Collective Agreements or Conventions must respect the guarantees constitutionally guaranteed to workers. The Federal Supreme Court ruled that Collective Bargaining Agreements or Agreements that limit or suppress labor rights are valid, provided that […]
Companies that file a judicial recovery action and have their activities carried out in leased properties may, in the event of default, face an eviction action, even if the credit is listed in the creditors list. On this topic, there are some very important issues being dealt with in the courts regarding the suspension of the demand and about the resumption of the asset during the period of processing of the judicial reorganization.
On June 27th, Law nº 14. 382/2022 was enacted, whose main objective is the creation of the Electronic System of Public Records (SERP), which aims to unify the systems of notary offices throughout the country, reducing the bureaucracy of the national notary system ( the measure covers the registrations of real estate, titles and civil documents of natural persons and […]
In large-scale contracts, complexity, amounts involved, and time are common causes of conflict between the parties. An effective option to help prevent and resolve these disputes is called a dispute board. This method, unlike mediation, arbitration and conciliation, consists of creating a council of technicians, appointed […]
The restrictive measures adopted worldwide to minimize the spread of Covid-19 have undeniably brought significant impacts to various sectors of the economy. The determination of isolation or quarantine to face the pandemic, the most effective measure to reduce the circulation of the contagious agent, has made the sector of culture and entertainment events […]
In force since May 2, 2022, CVM Resolution No. 80 brings a new notice on corporate demands, regulating the registration and provision of periodic and occasional information from the issuers of securities. Such regulation was the subject of Public Hearing 1/21 and consolidated the content of Instructions No. 367 and 480 […]
Advertising cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant advertisements and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors to websites and collect information to deliver personalized advertisements.