No 3º Congresso Cerealista Brasileiro, contribuímos para ampliar o debate sobre as alternativas disponíveis aos credores diante do avanço da recuperação judicial no agronegócio. A apresentação conduzida por Thomas Dulac Müller, sócio-diretor da CPDMA, destacou os principais pontos de atenção para cerealistas e demais agentes da cadeia, com foco na organização coletiva, na atuação estratégica em […]
CPDMA BLOG
Category: News
Date: March 21, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team
STJ maintains fine on company that sells advance tickets
The 2nd panel of the Superior Court of Justice unanimously denied, this Thursday (21/3), an appeal in which Tickets for Fun intended to reverse a fine of more than R$ 1 million for violations of the Consumer Protection Code applied by Procon Sao Paulo.
In the session, the collegiate maintained a previous decision of the Court of Justice of São Paulo. The TJ concluded that the advance sale of tickets to certain consumers, holders of specific credit cards, prevents other interested parties from competing with equal conditions, not being allowed to choose any place or seat at the show or, even, opt for tickets with more affordable values.
The rapporteur, Minister Mauro Campbell, stated that in order to reject the conclusions adopted by the TJ and accept the company's thesis of the inexistence of abusive practice, "it would be essential to revolve the factual and evidential content already analyzed, which is prohibited by the precedent 7 of the Court , which prohibits the re-examination of facts and evidence".
"In relation to the proportionality of the arbitrated fine, also questioned by the company, in order to assess the issue, it would be essential to analyze Procon's ordinance 26/06, and the interpretation of the constant mathematical formula, since such a procedure is impossible since the administrative act does not fall under the concept of Federal law or treaty", he explained.
Illegal Fee
Last week, the 3rd class of the Court ruled on the illegality of the convenience fee for tickets purchased over the internet in a lawsuit involving Ingresso Rápido, filed by a Consumer Protection Association of Rio Grande do Sul. The collegiate also determined the reimbursement of the company's clients since 2008, five years before the lawsuit was filed in the judiciary.
All consumers who can prove payment of the fee, regardless of whether they are part of the association, will be able to qualify for reimbursement, after the action is completed.
Source: Gabriela Coelho via Conjur.
Recent posts
Lease agreements: attention to the deadlines of the Transitional Regime under the Tax Reform
Read more
The Tax Reform, provided for in the Federal Constitution (art. 156-A), in Complementary Bill No. 108/2024, and in Complementary Law No. 214/2025, had as its main goal to transform the consumption taxation system in Brazil. Five complex taxes were eliminated — PIS, Cofins, IPI, ICMS, and ISS — which will be replaced by […]
STJ upholds acquisition for any price in the 3rd round of the bankruptcy auction and rejects claims of an unfairly low price
A Terceira Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) proferiu uma decisão de grande impacto no Direito Empresarial e Processual, validando a arrematação de um imóvel de massa falida por apenas 2% de sua avaliação. Esta decisão é fundamental e reforça a prioridade da Lei de Falências (Lei nº 11.101/2005, atualizada pela Lei nº 14.112/2020) […]
New STJ ruling: protection for co-owners in cases of attachment and auction of indivisible assets
Read more
Em recente julgamento (REsp 2.180.611-DF), a Terceira Turma do STJ estabeleceu um entendimento crucial que visa proteger o patrimônio do coproprietário ou cônjuge, em caso de penhora e arrematação de bens indivisíveis, que não tem responsabilidade pela dívida (o alheio à execução). O que mudou e o que você precisa saber? A lei (Código de Processo Civil - […]
Selic is the applicable interest rate for late payment in civil debts, rules the STJ
Read more
O Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) firmou um importante entendimento no Tema Repetitivo 1368 sobre a taxa de juros de mora aplicável a dívidas de natureza civil no Brasil, antes da vigência da Lei n.º 14.905/2024. --- A tese firmada: o STJ estabeleceu que o artigo 406 do Código Civil de 2002 (em sua redação anterior à Lei […]
Rural sale-and-leaseback: liquidity for companies in crisis and protected returns for investors
No agronegócio brasileiro, a busca por capital rápido em meio à escalada dos juros fez crescer uma estrutura já conhecida no mercado imobiliário urbano: o sale-and-leaseback. A lógica é direta: o produtor vende a área rural a um investidor, recebe o dinheiro à vista e, no mesmo ato, assina um contrato de arrendamento a longo prazo […]
English 
Português do Brasil 
Español