Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: March 18, 2021
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Congress overturns presidential vetoes to Law 14,112/20 and rehydrates the reform of the Business Recovery Law

The Presidency of the Republic sanctioned Law 14.112/20, which reformed Law 11.101/05, but with vetoes to important provisions - especially with regard to tax matters.

On yesterday's date (03/17), however, such vetoes were overturned by Congress (with the exception of two provisions - one that extended the suspension of labor executions to solidary debtors and another that dealt with the Rural Product Certificate), thus restoring good part of what was good about legislative reform.

Fundamentally, Law 11.101/05 is now in force with rules that:

(i) Make the rules for non-succession of the purchaser of the debtor's production units more consistent and secure, explaining that such protection covers "obligations of any nature, including those of an environmental, regulatory, administrative, criminal, anti-corruption, tax and labor nature ".

(ii) Remove the limitation of tax losses that can be used for deduction from the calculation basis of the capital gain resulting from the disposal of assets in the recovery process;

(iii) Exclude from the PIS/COFINS tax base the income arising from the discount and exclude the percentage limitation of the gain resulting from the discount in the calculation of IR and CSLL (reduction of adjusted net income by exclusion and negative tax base);

(iv) Make the "expenses corresponding to the obligations assumed in the judicial reorganization plan" deductible from the taxable income and CSLL basis;

(v) They expressly admit the filing of judicial/extrajudicial recovery by medical cooperatives.

These rules, now returned to Law 14,112/20 and, consequently, included in Law 11,101/05, represent an important step towards providing legal certainty to the purchasers of assets in judicial recovery processes (generating value for all those involved) and, within the scope of tax, eliminate the paradoxical tax burden resulting from a debt restructuring in which, in the end, everyone gives in and everyone loses, to some extent. 

The overturning of vetoes, therefore, should be celebrated.

Source: Daniel Burchardt Piccoli, lawyer and partner at Cesar Peres Dulac Müller.

Return

Recent posts

Creditors' Alternative Plan in the Judicial Reorganization of Rural Producers

No 3º Congresso Cerealista Brasileiro, contribuímos para ampliar o debate sobre as alternativas disponíveis aos credores diante do avanço da recuperação judicial no agronegócio. A apresentação conduzida por Thomas Dulac Müller, sócio-diretor da CPDMA, destacou os principais pontos de atenção para cerealistas e demais agentes da cadeia, com foco na organização coletiva, na atuação estratégica em […]

Read more
Lease agreements: attention to the deadlines of the Transitional Regime under the Tax Reform

The Tax Reform, provided for in the Federal Constitution (art. 156-A), in Complementary Bill No. 108/2024, and in Complementary Law No. 214/2025, had as its main goal to transform the consumption taxation system in Brazil. Five complex taxes were eliminated — PIS, Cofins, IPI, ICMS, and ISS — which will be replaced by […]

Read more

STJ upholds acquisition for any price in the 3rd round of the bankruptcy auction and rejects claims of an unfairly low price

A Terceira Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) proferiu uma decisão de grande impacto no Direito Empresarial e Processual, validando a arrematação de um imóvel de massa falida por apenas 2% de sua avaliação. Esta decisão é fundamental e reforça a prioridade da Lei de Falências (Lei nº 11.101/2005, atualizada pela Lei nº 14.112/2020) […]

Read more
New STJ ruling: protection for co-owners in cases of attachment and auction of indivisible assets

Em recente julgamento (REsp 2.180.611-DF), a Terceira Turma do STJ estabeleceu um entendimento crucial que visa proteger o patrimônio do coproprietário ou cônjuge, em caso de penhora e arrematação de bens indivisíveis, que não tem responsabilidade pela dívida (o alheio à execução). O que mudou e o que você precisa saber? A lei (Código de Processo Civil - […]

Read more
Selic is the applicable interest rate for late payment in civil debts, rules the STJ

O Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) firmou um importante entendimento no Tema Repetitivo 1368 sobre a taxa de juros de mora aplicável a dívidas de natureza civil no Brasil, antes da vigência da Lei n.º 14.905/2024. --- A tese firmada: o STJ estabeleceu que o artigo 406 do Código Civil de 2002 (em sua redação anterior à Lei […]

Read more

Rural sale-and-leaseback: liquidity for companies in crisis and protected returns for investors

No agronegócio brasileiro, a busca por capital rápido em meio à escalada dos juros fez crescer uma estrutura já conhecida no mercado imobiliário urbano: o sale-and-leaseback. A lógica é direta: o produtor vende a área rural a um investidor, recebe o dinheiro à vista e, no mesmo ato, assina um contrato de arrendamento a longo prazo […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram