Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: June 9, 2021
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Approved the legal framework for startups

Last Tuesday (06/01) the Federal Government sanctioned the Legal Framework for Startups and Innovative Entrepreneurship, through Complementary Law No. ).

The sanctioned text presents measures to stimulate the creation of innovative companies and investment incentives through the improvement of the business environment in the country with a focus on contracting innovative solutions by the Public Administration and on legal certainty for entrepreneurs and investors. 

The main measures included in the legal text are summarized below: 

1 – The veto of the amendments that stipulated the imputation of responsibility of the angel investors in the scope of civil, labor and tax relations was maintained. In this way, angel investors will not be reached by any disregard of legal personality and the contributions made by them will not integrate the startup's capital stock - unless the investor expressly chooses - bringing greater asset security to the investor. It should be noted that the angel investor may be an individual and/or a legal entity. 

2 – The creation of a special bidding modality for the contracting of startups by the Public Administration through the Public Contract for Innovative Solutions (CPSI) was maintained, aiming at remuneration for the development and testing of the technological solution presented up to the ceiling of R$ 1.6 million. 

3 – Also, companies that have investment obligations in research, development and innovation, arising from grants or delegations signed through regulatory agencies, are authorized to fulfill their commitments to invest resources in startups through the creation of equity funds or equity investment funds (FIPs). 

4 – Tax adjustments were vetoed throughout the legislative process of the Legal Framework, such as the possibility of investors' losses being included in the calculation of the capital gain to be declared by the angel investor, who will continue to pay the tax corresponding to the gain of capital – different from what happens with investors in shares of publicly traded companies. 

5 – Another demand from entrepreneurs and investors that was not covered was the tax equivalence of investment in startups to the Real Estate Letter of Credit (LCI) and the Agribusiness Letter of Credit (LCA), both exempt from income tax collection as they are considered strategic sectors to the Brazilian economy. Contrary to what was requested, the taxation of angel investment will remain between 15% and 22.5% on capital gain. 

6 – Another novelty was the inclusion of Startups in a new special tax regime called Inova Simples, which may grant differentiated treatment to all those companies that declare themselves as innovation companies.

7 – The Complementary Law also brought changes in the Law of Corporations, exempting privately held companies, with annual gross revenue of up to R$ 78 million, from printed publications, which may operate with digital books of electronic records with publication on the internet. Thus, considering the high growth projection of a startup, the corporate regime of corporations may be the most appropriate, considering the governance mechanisms by which they are governed, and now with lower maintenance costs. 

8 – Another change in the discipline of corporations promoted in the Complementary Law is the possibility of constituting the board of directors with only one member, removing the requirement of two members previously provided for. 

9 – In the area of amendments to the Law of Corporations, the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission was also given the commitment and duty to regulate the easier access of smaller companies to the Capital Market, which is an important alternative for raising new resources.

Source: CPDMA Corporate Team.

Return

Recent posts

The risk of not being aware of a brand's changes

A marca de azeites portugueses GALLO aproveitou a proximidade da Páscoa e anunciou uma modificação na forma de apresentação da marca e do rótulo de seus produtos. Segundo o diretor de marketing da empresa, Pedro Gonçalves, a nova identidade visual foi inspirada em uma lenda sobre a origem da marca. Ele relata que em 1919, […]

Read more
The protection afforded to highly renowned trademarks

In recent weeks, news has been circulating on legal websites that the Federal Court has annulled a registration for the "CHEVETTE DRINK" trademark. The registration, with a nominative presentation, was considered annullable for infringing article 124, item VI, of the Industrial Property Law (LPI), which prohibits the registration of signs of a generic nature, commonly used for [...]

Read more
Electronic Judicial Domicile: companies must register by May 30

Large and medium-sized companies [1] across the country will have until May 30, 2024 to voluntarily register with the Electronic Judicial Domicile, a tool of the Justice 4.0 Program that centralizes information and communications about cases in Brazilian courts. After this deadline, registration will be compulsory, starting [...]

Read more
Was the instability on Instagram and Facebook the result of a court decision?

There has been speculation over the last few days as to whether the instability of the social networks Instagram and Facebook is a result of the court decision handed down by the São Paulo Court of Justice (TJSP), which ordered Meta Platforms, INC., which owns the platforms, to refrain from using the 'META' trademark, first registered in Brazil by the company Meta Serviços [...].

Read more
Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.

On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]

Read more
The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram