Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: June 9, 2021
Posted by: CPDMA team

Approved the legal framework for startups

Last Tuesday (06/01) the Federal Government sanctioned the Legal Framework for Startups and Innovative Entrepreneurship, through Complementary Law No. ).

The sanctioned text presents measures to stimulate the creation of innovative companies and investment incentives through the improvement of the business environment in the country with a focus on contracting innovative solutions by the Public Administration and on legal certainty for entrepreneurs and investors. 

The main measures included in the legal text are summarized below: 

1 – The veto of the amendments that stipulated the imputation of responsibility of the angel investors in the scope of civil, labor and tax relations was maintained. In this way, angel investors will not be reached by any disregard of legal personality and the contributions made by them will not integrate the startup's capital stock - unless the investor expressly chooses - bringing greater asset security to the investor. It should be noted that the angel investor may be an individual and/or a legal entity. 

2 – The creation of a special bidding modality for the contracting of startups by the Public Administration through the Public Contract for Innovative Solutions (CPSI) was maintained, aiming at remuneration for the development and testing of the technological solution presented up to the ceiling of R$ 1.6 million. 

3 – Also, companies that have investment obligations in research, development and innovation, arising from grants or delegations signed through regulatory agencies, are authorized to fulfill their commitments to invest resources in startups through the creation of equity funds or equity investment funds (FIPs). 

4 – Tax adjustments were vetoed throughout the legislative process of the Legal Framework, such as the possibility of investors' losses being included in the calculation of the capital gain to be declared by the angel investor, who will continue to pay the tax corresponding to the gain of capital – different from what happens with investors in shares of publicly traded companies. 

5 – Another demand from entrepreneurs and investors that was not covered was the tax equivalence of investment in startups to the Real Estate Letter of Credit (LCI) and the Agribusiness Letter of Credit (LCA), both exempt from income tax collection as they are considered strategic sectors to the Brazilian economy. Contrary to what was requested, the taxation of angel investment will remain between 15% and 22.5% on capital gain. 

6 – Another novelty was the inclusion of Startups in a new special tax regime called Inova Simples, which may grant differentiated treatment to all those companies that declare themselves as innovation companies.

7 – The Complementary Law also brought changes in the Law of Corporations, exempting privately held companies, with annual gross revenue of up to R$ 78 million, from printed publications, which may operate with digital books of electronic records with publication on the internet. Thus, considering the high growth projection of a startup, the corporate regime of corporations may be the most appropriate, considering the governance mechanisms by which they are governed, and now with lower maintenance costs. 

8 – Another change in the discipline of corporations promoted in the Complementary Law is the possibility of constituting the board of directors with only one member, removing the requirement of two members previously provided for. 

9 – In the area of amendments to the Law of Corporations, the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission was also given the commitment and duty to regulate the easier access of smaller companies to the Capital Market, which is an important alternative for raising new resources.

Source: CPDMA Corporate Team.


recent posts

STF decides that collective rule that restricts labor rights is constitutional

STF decides that collective rule that restricts labor law is constitutional. The Court observed, however, that the reduction of rights by Collective Agreements or Conventions must respect the guarantees constitutionally guaranteed to workers. The Federal Supreme Court ruled that Collective Bargaining Agreements or Agreements that limit or suppress labor rights are valid, provided that […]

Read more
The eviction action in the judicial recovery

Companies that file a judicial recovery action and have their activities carried out in leased properties may, in the event of default, face an eviction action, even if the credit is listed in the creditors list. On this topic, there are some very important issues being dealt with in the courts regarding the suspension of the demand and about the resumption of the asset during the period of processing of the judicial reorganization.

Read more
Law to reduce bureaucracy of Public Records passed

On June 27th, Law nº 14. 382/2022 was enacted, whose main objective is the creation of the Electronic System of Public Records (SERP), which aims to unify the systems of notary offices throughout the country, reducing the bureaucracy of the national notary system ( the measure covers the registrations of real estate, titles and civil documents of natural persons and […]

Read more
Bidding law and the use of Dispute Boards

In large-scale contracts, complexity, amounts involved, and time are common causes of conflict between the parties. An effective option to help prevent and resolve these disputes is called a dispute board. This method, unlike mediation, arbitration and conciliation, consists of creating a council of technicians, appointed […]

Read more
Tax Benefits to the Events Sector - PERSE Law

The restrictive measures adopted worldwide to minimize the spread of Covid-19 have undeniably brought significant impacts to various sectors of the economy. The determination of isolation or quarantine to face the pandemic, the most effective measure to reduce the circulation of the contagious agent, has made the sector of culture and entertainment events […]

Read more
CVM Resolution No. 80 and the dissonance with the secrecy inherent to arbitration proceedings

In force since May 2, 2022, CVM Resolution No. 80 brings a new notice on corporate demands, regulating the registration and provision of periodic and occasional information from the issuers of securities. Such regulation was the subject of Public Hearing 1/21 and consolidated the content of Instructions No. 367 and 480 […]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram