Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: December 16, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Beer style name registration does not guarantee exclusivity

The registration of the designation of a beer style at the National Institute of Industrial Property (Inpi), even as a brand, should not prevent competitors from mentioning it on the labels of their products. After all, it is an expression in common use, which cannot be exclusively appropriated.

This was the understanding applied, by majority, by the 6th Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Rio Grande do Sul when it overturned an injunction, granted at the end of June, which prevented Cervejaria Abadessa, from Pareci Novo (RS), from using the designation helles (clear/clear/bright, in German) for one of their beers.

The dispute began in January 2019 after the Fassbier Brewery registered, as a brand, the name of the beer style. To prevent competitors, it began to send out-of-court notification informing that it was the exclusive holder of the trademark registration at Inpi since August 2007.

Against the Abadessa brewery, one of the main brewers of the beer style in Rio Grande do Sul, Fassbier asked in court that the competitor be prohibited from using the brand, in addition to material and moral damages.

Judge Cláudia Brugger, from the 4th Civil Court of Caxias do Sul, granted an injunction prohibiting the Abbess from using the expression helles. "There is danger of damage, since the registration of the trademark grants the applicant the exclusive use of the trademark until the end of its validity", said the judge, setting a daily fine of 5 thousand, limited to R$ 50 thousand in case of non-compliance.

The Abbess lodged an appeal, asking the Court of Justice to reverse the decision. The lawyer Vanessa Oliveira Soares, from Cesar Peres Advocacia Empresarial (CPAE) acted in the defense of Cervejaria Abadessa.

The rapporteur of the grievance in the 6th Civil Chamber, judge Eliziana da Silveira Perez, voted to maintain the injunction. However, the rapporteur was outvoted. The divergence opened by the judge Ney Wiedemann Neto prevailed.

According to the judge, the misuse of name or brand was not evidenced, given that the plaintiff's registration is of the name helles, which is nothing more than the designation of a style of beer. So in common use.

Wiedemann pointed out that the defendant's trademark is ''Cervejaria Abadessa'', not ''Helles''. And that this word printed on the label is intended to inform the consumer about a beer category, which differs from the others in terms of color, flavor, strength, ingredients, production method, recipe, history or origin. As in the lager, pilsen, weissbier, india pale ale, red ale and even munich helles styles, among others.

Thus, with the support of the judge, Luís Augusto Coelho Braga, he considered the claim of exclusive use of the expression by the author to be unreasonable, in view of the registration at Inpi. ''That said, I vote to grant the interlocutory appeal for the purpose of allowing the appellant [Abbess] to continue its activities, manufacturing and marketing helles-style beer'', he concluded in the judgment.

Source: Jomar Martins via Conjur.


Recent posts

Corporate name: get to know this asset class

Continuing with our series of posts explaining the differences between the classes of intellectual assets, today we'll look at the BUSINESS NAME. Although trademarks - the nature of which has already been described in the previous post - can sometimes be confused with business names, they are distinct legal institutes. The business name identifies the company by [...]

Read more
PERSE: legislative changes in the emergency program to revive the events sector

Law No. 14,859/2024: amendment of the Perse rules for the period 2024 to 2026. The Emergency Program for the Resumption of the Events Sector - Perse was created in 2021 with a view to helping companies linked to the events sector - the activity most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, by reducing [...]

Read more
The extent of insurance cover in floods

The rains that have hit Rio Grande do Sul in recent weeks have destroyed farms, properties and vehicles. Even if they have insurance, car or property owners should check the coverage of their policies to see if they can get compensation. Basic insurance for cars and properties does not usually cover floods. Insurance against electrical breakdown, [...]

Read more
The agreement to sell the most famous slimming drug of the moment

It was recently reported that the Brazilian company BIOMM has signed an agreement with the pharmaceutical industry BIOCON to distribute in Brazil a drug similar to Ozempic, indicated for the treatment of diabetes, but used mainly to treat obesity. However, this will only be possible because the patent holder of the drug has certainly authorized, through a [...]

Read more
Get to know the “brand” asset class

Continuing with our series of posts explaining the differences between the classes of intellectual assets, today we're going to talk about the TRADEMARK. A trademark is a sign used to distinguish and identify a product or service. It is registered with the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), guaranteeing the owner exclusive use in [...]

Read more
Intellectual property gives the author, inventor or holder of knowledge the power to protect their rights.

Intellectual property gives the author, inventor and/or owner of the protected knowledge the power to protect their rights, and can, for example, prohibit third parties from producing, using, selling or importing their invention, as well as preventing the reproduction or imitation of their trademark, in addition to guaranteeing exclusivity to the owner of the creation [1] (ARAÚJO; BARBOSA; QUEIROGA; ALVES, 2010). [...]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram