Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: January 28, 2020
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Carf understands that mining company's holding company was created to avoid paying taxes

For the tax authorities, the Spanish holding of a company incorporated into CNS Mineração aimed to avoid the incidence of IRPJ and CSLL.

Nacional Minério S/A (Namisa), a company merged into CSN Mineração, will pay taxes on profits of an indirect subsidiary abroad for 2008 in the amount of R$ 236.8 million, excluding monetary and interest adjustments. The decision of the Administrative Council of Tax Appeals (Carf) took place on Wednesday of last week (15/1). The company can still file an embargo on the decision or file a lawsuit.

According to the tax indictment, the company created a scheme abroad to evade the Brazilian tax authorities. According to the records, Namisa explored iron ore in Brazil and, when it was going to export, instead of selling to the direct exporter, it sold to a trading company of the same business group, located in the free zone of Madeira Island, therefore , tax free. The trading company did the negotiations with the iron ore buyers and the profit from the operations stayed on Madeira Island.

According to the Attorney General's Office of the National Treasury (PGFN), in order to prevent the foreign trading company's profit from being taxed by the Brazilian parent company on each calculation balance, as Brazilian law provides, Namisa created a holding company in Spain called Investments CSN Spain. Thus, according to the agreement signed between Brazil and Spain to avoid double taxation, the profit was taxed only in Spain and not in Brazil.

“The interposition of the holding company had an elusive purpose, so much so that the manager of the holding in Spain was the same as the trading company and lived on Madeira Island,” said National Treasury attorney Moisés Pereira, coordinator of action before Carf.

Thus, for the Brazilian tax authorities, the Spanish holding company had an abusive intention to avoid the levy of Corporate Income Tax (IRPJ) and Social Contribution on Net Income (CSLL) of the foreign subsidiary. Therefore, the auditor drew up the tax assessment and, for the calculation, he used the trading profit contained in the holding company's consolidated balance sheet.

Defense

The defense argued that Brazil could not tax the profits earned in Spain by the subsidiary on the island of Madeira, as it can only tax a subsidiary and not an entity with its own legal personality existing in the other State. “What is the legal security that the taxpayer has if the inspector does not obey the normative instruction of the Federal Revenue?”, questioned the lawyer of the company Roberto Duque Estrada, in oral argument.

However, the argument was not accepted by most of the councilors who accepted the thesis of the National Treasury that taxation of trading was possible. "There is no doubt that the taxation of results earned by an indirect subsidiary located in a tax haven dependency is perfectly valid", said the rapporteur Cristiane Silva Costa, during the reading of the vote.

Through the press office, Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional reported that the company does not comment on court decisions.

The case in question is being processed at Carf under number 10880.728246/2012-87.

Source: Flávia Maia via Jota.

Return

Recent posts

Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.

On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]

Read more
The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]

Read more
Business position on the recent STF decision that ruled that it is constitutional for trade unions to charge assistance contributions

Recently, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) unanimously ruled that unions can collect an assistance contribution, including from non-member employees, in ARE 1.18.459 (Topic 935 of the General Repercussion), as long as the worker is guaranteed the right to object, establishing the following thesis: "it is constitutional to establish, by agreement or [...]

Read more
The new chapter in the legal dispute involving the term "HELLES", registered as a 'trademark'.

Recalling the case... It all started at the beginning of 2019, when the brewery Fassbier gave extrajudicial notice to a series of breweries in Rio Grande do Sul for the alleged misuse of the term HELLES, claiming to have exclusive use of the expression, given that the word was registered as a trademark. Not satisfied with [...]

Read more
Suspension of labor executions against companies in the same economic group

In a recent decision, the STF suspended the processing of labor executions that discuss the inclusion, in the execution phase, of a company that is part of an economic group that did not participate in the knowledge process. In labor proceedings, when the execution phase is reached and the main debtor does not have enough assets to pay the debt, many [...]

Read more
STJ decides that the legal personality of a civil association can be disregarded, but limits liability to the directors

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) [1] dismissed a special appeal filed by the directors of a civil association, which had its legal personality disregarded in a case involving the improper use of a trademark. The Court, in a judgment drafted by Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze, held that the disregard of [...]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram