Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: March 18, 2021
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Congress overturns presidential vetoes to Law 14,112/20 and rehydrates the reform of the Business Recovery Law

The Presidency of the Republic sanctioned Law 14.112/20, which reformed Law 11.101/05, but with vetoes to important provisions - especially with regard to tax matters.

On yesterday's date (03/17), however, such vetoes were overturned by Congress (with the exception of two provisions - one that extended the suspension of labor executions to solidary debtors and another that dealt with the Rural Product Certificate), thus restoring good part of what was good about legislative reform.

Fundamentally, Law 11.101/05 is now in force with rules that:

(i) Make the rules for non-succession of the purchaser of the debtor's production units more consistent and secure, explaining that such protection covers "obligations of any nature, including those of an environmental, regulatory, administrative, criminal, anti-corruption, tax and labor nature ".

(ii) Remove the limitation of tax losses that can be used for deduction from the calculation basis of the capital gain resulting from the disposal of assets in the recovery process;

(iii) Exclude from the PIS/COFINS tax base the income arising from the discount and exclude the percentage limitation of the gain resulting from the discount in the calculation of IR and CSLL (reduction of adjusted net income by exclusion and negative tax base);

(iv) Make the "expenses corresponding to the obligations assumed in the judicial reorganization plan" deductible from the taxable income and CSLL basis;

(v) They expressly admit the filing of judicial/extrajudicial recovery by medical cooperatives.

These rules, now returned to Law 14,112/20 and, consequently, included in Law 11,101/05, represent an important step towards providing legal certainty to the purchasers of assets in judicial recovery processes (generating value for all those involved) and, within the scope of tax, eliminate the paradoxical tax burden resulting from a debt restructuring in which, in the end, everyone gives in and everyone loses, to some extent. 

The overturning of vetoes, therefore, should be celebrated.

Source: Daniel Burchardt Piccoli, lawyer and partner at Cesar Peres Dulac Müller.

Return

Recent posts

The risk of not being aware of a brand's changes

A marca de azeites portugueses GALLO aproveitou a proximidade da Páscoa e anunciou uma modificação na forma de apresentação da marca e do rótulo de seus produtos. Segundo o diretor de marketing da empresa, Pedro Gonçalves, a nova identidade visual foi inspirada em uma lenda sobre a origem da marca. Ele relata que em 1919, […]

Read more
The protection afforded to highly renowned trademarks

In recent weeks, news has been circulating on legal websites that the Federal Court has annulled a registration for the "CHEVETTE DRINK" trademark. The registration, with a nominative presentation, was considered annullable for infringing article 124, item VI, of the Industrial Property Law (LPI), which prohibits the registration of signs of a generic nature, commonly used for [...]

Read more
Electronic Judicial Domicile: companies must register by May 30

Large and medium-sized companies [1] across the country will have until May 30, 2024 to voluntarily register with the Electronic Judicial Domicile, a tool of the Justice 4.0 Program that centralizes information and communications about cases in Brazilian courts. After this deadline, registration will be compulsory, starting [...]

Read more
Was the instability on Instagram and Facebook the result of a court decision?

There has been speculation over the last few days as to whether the instability of the social networks Instagram and Facebook is a result of the court decision handed down by the São Paulo Court of Justice (TJSP), which ordered Meta Platforms, INC., which owns the platforms, to refrain from using the 'META' trademark, first registered in Brazil by the company Meta Serviços [...].

Read more
Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.

On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]

Read more
The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram