Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: 28 de September de 2023
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Registration of position marks: when one of the world's most famous position marks is rejected in Brazil

Imagem de Vanessa Pereira Oliveira Soares que ilustra seu artigo sobre a marca Louboutin no Brasil.

A trademark is a sign used to distinguish and identify a product or service. The Industrial Property Law provides for the possibility of registering all visually perceptible distinctive signs, as long as they are not included in the legal prohibitions (article 122 of the Civil Code), Law 9.279/96).

As for presentation, until September 2022 the Brazilian trademark registration system provided for the protection of word marks (protection of the word that constitutes the mark), figurative marks (protection of a drawing that symbolizes the mark), mixed marks (combination of the figure/drawing plus the word in stylized writing), considered traditional marks, and three-dimensional marks (protection of the plastic form - packaging or the product - capable of individualizing the product), the only type of non-traditional mark that could be registered in Brazil until then.

With the advent of Ordinance 37 of September 13, 2021, the INPI began to provide for the possibility of registering position marks, a type of non-traditional mark that had previously been registrable in countries such as France, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Italy and Spain, among others.

There are various types of non-traditional brands, such as movement, tactile, olfactory, sound, taste, holograms, three-dimensional, position and others.

As provided for in the aforementioned resolution, the distinctive set formed by the application of a sign in a singular and specific position on a given support will be registrable as a position mark, provided that it is dissociated from a technical or functional effect.

The Ordinance established the possibility of changing the form of presentation of applications for registration of this type of trademark made before the rule came into force, allowing interested parties to change their applications within 90 days of its entry into force.

This is how the emblematic case of the trademark position of Christian Louboutin's famous red-soled shoe has gained great repercussions in recent months.

The trademark, initially applied for in 2009 under a three-dimensional presentation, sought to protect the red sole of a high-heeled women's shoe with a specific shade (Pantone No. 18.1663 TP), except for the heel.

Using the option to change the presentation of the trademark, provided for by INPI Ordinance 37/2021, the owner of the trademark applied to the Autarchy, requesting a change from a figurative trademark to a position trademark.

When it was examined on the merits, the application for the trademark for the famous red-soled shoe was rejected on the flimsy grounds that it did not meet the requirement of the distinctiveness of the sign applied for.

This decision was heavily criticized for its lack of reasoning. And rightly so, since the Trademark Manual (2023) is clear when dealing with the substantive examination and analysis of applications for position marks, stating that: "The uniqueness of the position refers to it being peculiar in support, not being a position traditionally used for the application of trademark signs".

When dealing with the analysis of distinctiveness, the same Manual states that: "For the position mark to meet the requirement of distinctiveness, it is necessary that the application of the sign to the support results in a distinctive whole, being perceived as a mark. The examination of a position mark primarily assesses whether the ensemble resulting from the application of a trademark sign on a given support has distinctive potential, bringing together characteristics (uniqueness of the position and distinctiveness of the sign) that make it capable of being recognized by the consumer and associated with the product or service it marks - regardless of whether the sign is already in use in the market.".

The holder of the application then waived her right to an administrative appeal against the decision and appealed to the courts seeking to have the decision annulled.

A preliminary injunction was granted to suspend the administrative act that rejected the trademark application until the end of the process.

The Judge of the 13th Federal Court, Dr. Márcia Maria Nunes de Barros, rightly ruled that the application for registration of the position mark was distinctive to the extent that: a) it is formed by the application of a sign (red color with specific shade Pantone No. 18. 166TP) in a specific position (sole, except for the heel area). 166TP), in a specific position (sole, with the exception of the heel area) of a given support (high-heeled women's shoes) to the holder of the application; b) the use of the sign in the specific position is not associated with a technical or functional effect; c) trademarks are not usually positioned on the sole of shoes; d) the trademark is applied in a specific position; e) the whole resulting from the application of the color red, with a specific shade - Pantone No. 18.166TP - on high-heeled women's shoes has, in principle, distinctive potential, making it capable of being recognized by the consumer public.

The magistrate also pointed out that it is public knowledge that the famous fashion designer Christian Louboutin uses the application of red soles to his high-heeled women's shoes as a form of visual identity for his products, as well as the fact that he has registered the trademark in more than 20 countries. In this way, maintaining the decision to reject the trademark could cause a great deal of damage to the brand, since the competition could believe that the sign was in the public domain and its use was free.

Case No. 5082257-22.2023.4.02.5101, JFRJ.

By: Vanessa Pereira Oliveira Soares

Intellectual Property | CPDMA Team


Recent posts

Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.

On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]

Read more
The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]

Read more
Business position on the recent STF decision that ruled that it is constitutional for trade unions to charge assistance contributions

Recently, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) unanimously ruled that unions can collect an assistance contribution, including from non-member employees, in ARE 1.18.459 (Topic 935 of the General Repercussion), as long as the worker is guaranteed the right to object, establishing the following thesis: "it is constitutional to establish, by agreement or [...]

Read more
The new chapter in the legal dispute involving the term "HELLES", registered as a 'trademark'.

Recalling the case... It all started at the beginning of 2019, when the brewery Fassbier gave extrajudicial notice to a series of breweries in Rio Grande do Sul for the alleged misuse of the term HELLES, claiming to have exclusive use of the expression, given that the word was registered as a trademark. Not satisfied with [...]

Read more
Suspension of labor executions against companies in the same economic group

In a recent decision, the STF suspended the processing of labor executions that discuss the inclusion, in the execution phase, of a company that is part of an economic group that did not participate in the knowledge process. In labor proceedings, when the execution phase is reached and the main debtor does not have enough assets to pay the debt, many [...]

Read more
STJ decides that the legal personality of a civil association can be disregarded, but limits liability to the directors

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) [1] dismissed a special appeal filed by the directors of a civil association, which had its legal personality disregarded in a case involving the improper use of a trademark. The Court, in a judgment drafted by Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze, held that the disregard of [...]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram