Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: March 22, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Usina Santa Terezinha, Paraná, asks for judicial recovery

Usina Santa Terezinha (Usçucar), the largest sugar and alcohol company in Paraná and one of the ten largest in Brazil, filed for judicial recovery last night after a setback in negotiations with creditor banks, as determined by Valor. The company has an estimated financial debt of R$ 4.6 billion, mostly in US dollars (US$ 900 million).

Santa Terezinha filed for judicial recovery after discovering that the bank Votorantim, to which it owes around R$ 150 million, had filed three enforcement requests in court. One of the actions, which called for the execution of R$ 40 million, was even carried out via BacenJud. The plant is represented in the process by the law firm Thomaz Bastos, Waisberg, Kurzweil Advogados.

The debt execution by Votorantim took the company from Paraná by surprise, as it was about to sign an agreement to renegotiate the terms of its debt with 18 creditor banks - among them Votorantim itself -, after more than a year of negotiations.

Last year, Santa Terezinha informally agreed with the banks not to pay interest and principal on the debt while negotiating the restructuring of payments.

With the request for judicial recovery, negotiations with the banks will have to start over from scratch.

Usina Santa Terezinha's debt is basically with banks. According to a source close to the company, there are practically no late payments with suppliers or overdue taxes, and delays with labor creditors are not very representative.

During this period in which it did not pay the banks, Santa Terezinha maintained its investments in working capital and capital goods, according to a source close to the company.

However, the company has been facing problems with a lack of sugarcane to fill the capacity of its production units in the face of adverse weather conditions in its operating region since 2015. Of its 11 plants, three did not operate in the 2018/19 harvest. The company processed 14 million tons of cane in this cycle, but has already crushed 18 million tons in the 2016/17 harvest.

For the 2019/20 season, which will start in April, Santa Terezinha will also suspend grinding at Usina Moreira Sales. The sugarcane from the region where the unit operates will be directed to Usina Tapejara.

The company also controls two port terminals (Pasa and Álcool do Paraná) and CPA Trading.

Recently, Santa Terezinha made changes to its governance structure to professionalize, above all, operational management. Some members of the Meneghetti family, which owns the company, left the board and market executives were hired. Production “clusters” were also formed, integrating the operational activities of plants that are geographically close.

The company had already renegotiated its debts in 2016, at the time avoiding the path of judicial recovery at a time when several other companies in the segment were taking this path.

Source: Camila Souza Ramos via Valor Econômico.

Return

Recent posts

Creditors' Alternative Plan in the Judicial Reorganization of Rural Producers

No 3º Congresso Cerealista Brasileiro, contribuímos para ampliar o debate sobre as alternativas disponíveis aos credores diante do avanço da recuperação judicial no agronegócio. A apresentação conduzida por Thomas Dulac Müller, sócio-diretor da CPDMA, destacou os principais pontos de atenção para cerealistas e demais agentes da cadeia, com foco na organização coletiva, na atuação estratégica em […]

Read more
Lease agreements: attention to the deadlines of the Transitional Regime under the Tax Reform

The Tax Reform, provided for in the Federal Constitution (art. 156-A), in Complementary Bill No. 108/2024, and in Complementary Law No. 214/2025, had as its main goal to transform the consumption taxation system in Brazil. Five complex taxes were eliminated — PIS, Cofins, IPI, ICMS, and ISS — which will be replaced by […]

Read more

STJ upholds acquisition for any price in the 3rd round of the bankruptcy auction and rejects claims of an unfairly low price

A Terceira Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) proferiu uma decisão de grande impacto no Direito Empresarial e Processual, validando a arrematação de um imóvel de massa falida por apenas 2% de sua avaliação. Esta decisão é fundamental e reforça a prioridade da Lei de Falências (Lei nº 11.101/2005, atualizada pela Lei nº 14.112/2020) […]

Read more
New STJ ruling: protection for co-owners in cases of attachment and auction of indivisible assets

Em recente julgamento (REsp 2.180.611-DF), a Terceira Turma do STJ estabeleceu um entendimento crucial que visa proteger o patrimônio do coproprietário ou cônjuge, em caso de penhora e arrematação de bens indivisíveis, que não tem responsabilidade pela dívida (o alheio à execução). O que mudou e o que você precisa saber? A lei (Código de Processo Civil - […]

Read more
Selic is the applicable interest rate for late payment in civil debts, rules the STJ

O Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) firmou um importante entendimento no Tema Repetitivo 1368 sobre a taxa de juros de mora aplicável a dívidas de natureza civil no Brasil, antes da vigência da Lei n.º 14.905/2024. --- A tese firmada: o STJ estabeleceu que o artigo 406 do Código Civil de 2002 (em sua redação anterior à Lei […]

Read more

Rural sale-and-leaseback: liquidity for companies in crisis and protected returns for investors

No agronegócio brasileiro, a busca por capital rápido em meio à escalada dos juros fez crescer uma estrutura já conhecida no mercado imobiliário urbano: o sale-and-leaseback. A lógica é direta: o produtor vende a área rural a um investidor, recebe o dinheiro à vista e, no mesmo ato, assina um contrato de arrendamento a longo prazo […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram