Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: February 8, 2021
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Creditor's rights: contractual termination and suspension in the pandemic scenario

The pandemic scenario that devastated the end of 2019, the year 2020 and that still persists in 2021 brings numerous doubts because, in the face of events, several hirings were shaken, the default grew and the lack of clarity in the rules and jurisprudence established insecurity in relationships. Therefore, it is necessary for the creditor to be aware of his rights to prevent damages and abuses.

Among the legal provisions that involve the subject, article 393 of the Civil Code (1) which deals with acts of God and force majeure, as well as article 478 of the same code (2), for example, are being commonly used by debtors as argument to justify the termination of contracts. 

Following is an excerpt from art. 478, CC:

“Art. 478. In contracts of continued or deferred performance, if the performance of one of the parties becomes excessively onerous, with extreme advantage for the other, due to extraordinary and unforeseeable events, the debtor may request the termination of the contract [...] ”

Therefore, from reading the legal diploma above, it is prematurely understood that the request for termination due to the emergence of COVID-19 is enough for the relationship to be extinguished. Still, there is, in fact, jurisprudence eliminating the contractual fine and other charges, but the particularities of each case must be observed.

From this perspective, in the face of a request for termination or suspension of the contract, the creditor must know some of its main legal guarantees: 3). The contract cannot remain too onerous or generate extreme advantage for any of the parties, including the creditor himself.

The duty to renegotiate contracts is part of the general clause of objective good faith, but it is not an obligation to accept the proposal of the opposing party (4). The principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda (the pacts must be fulfilled) must be observed (5).

The courts have come to understand that the requirements of the contract must be observed, with termination and judicial review being extraordinary measures, and there must be regular adversarial proceedings and ample defense, including the payment of a bond (6).  

Therefore, aware of its rights, the creditor can protect itself and avoid unmotivated default, in order to guarantee the receipt of its credit or to see the agreed consideration satisfied. Furthermore, nothing prevents the contracts from being renegotiated or readjusted so that the relationship is not lost through the financial aggravation of the counterparty.


(1) Art. 393. The debtor is not liable for damages resulting from a fortuitous event or force majeure, if he is not expressly responsible for them. Single paragraph. The fortuitous event or force majeure is verified in the necessary fact, whose effects it was not possible to avoid or prevent.

(2) Art. 478. In contracts of continued or deferred performance, if the performance of one of the parties becomes excessively onerous, with extreme advantage for the other, due to extraordinary and unforeseeable events, the debtor may request the termination of the contract. The effects of the sentence that enacts it will retroact to the date of service.

(3) (TJ-DF 07112805420208070001 DF 0711280-54.2020.8.07.0001, Rapporteur: ANGELO PASSARELI, Judgment Date: 12/09/2020, 5th Civil Panel, Publication Date: Published in PJe: 01/11/2021. Page: No Page Registered).

(4) SCHEIBER, Anderson. Duty to renegotiate. Published January 16, 2018. Available at: http://genjuridico.com.br/2018/01/16/dever-de-renegociar/ Accessed January 25, 2021.

(5) (TJ-SP - AC: 10110275620208260003 SP 1011027-56.2020.8.26.0003, Rapporteur: Carlos Dias Motta, Judgment Date: 01/13/2021, 26th Private Law Chamber, Publication Date: 01/13/ 2021).

(6) (TJ-PR - AI: 00399941920208160000 PR 0039994-19.2020.8.16.0000 (Judgment), Rapporteur: Judge Marcelo Gobbo Dalla Dea, Judgment Date: 10/13/2020, 18th Civil Chamber, Publication Date: 13 /10/2020).

Source: Shaiene dos Santos Trindade da Costa, attorney at Cesar Peres Dulac Müller.


Recent posts

Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.

On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]

Read more
The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]

Read more
Business position on the recent STF decision that ruled that it is constitutional for trade unions to charge assistance contributions

Recently, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) unanimously ruled that unions can collect an assistance contribution, including from non-member employees, in ARE 1.18.459 (Topic 935 of the General Repercussion), as long as the worker is guaranteed the right to object, establishing the following thesis: "it is constitutional to establish, by agreement or [...]

Read more
The new chapter in the legal dispute involving the term "HELLES", registered as a 'trademark'.

Recalling the case... It all started at the beginning of 2019, when the brewery Fassbier gave extrajudicial notice to a series of breweries in Rio Grande do Sul for the alleged misuse of the term HELLES, claiming to have exclusive use of the expression, given that the word was registered as a trademark. Not satisfied with [...]

Read more
Suspension of labor executions against companies in the same economic group

In a recent decision, the STF suspended the processing of labor executions that discuss the inclusion, in the execution phase, of a company that is part of an economic group that did not participate in the knowledge process. In labor proceedings, when the execution phase is reached and the main debtor does not have enough assets to pay the debt, many [...]

Read more
STJ decides that the legal personality of a civil association can be disregarded, but limits liability to the directors

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) [1] dismissed a special appeal filed by the directors of a civil association, which had its legal personality disregarded in a case involving the improper use of a trademark. The Court, in a judgment drafted by Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze, held that the disregard of [...]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram