Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 22 de September de 2022
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Law altering the quorum for resolutions by limited liability companies is sanctioned

Imagem ilustrativa de uma reunião indicando um quóruns de deliberação de sociedades limitadas.

On September 21, the President of Brazil sanctioned Law No. 14451/2022,which amended articles 1061 and 1076 of the Civil Code (Law No. 10406, dated January 10, 2002), bringing important changes concerning the quorum for partners' resolutions in limited liability companies.

The changes introduced refer to the partners' resolutions on the appointment of managers who are not partners, amendments to the articles of association and in cases of merger, consolidation or dissolution of the company, or termination of the liquidation status.

Until then, article 1061 of the Civil Code provided that in cases where the corporate capital had not been paid up, the appointment of managers who were not partners would depend on the approval of unanimity of the partners, and, after the capital had been paid up, it would depend on the approval of at least 2/3 (two thirds) of them. What changes with the amendment is that, from now on, in a company with unpaid capital, the appointment of managers who are not partners will depend on the approval of at least two thirds (2/3) of the partners and, after the payment of the capital, the approval will depend on the partners representing more than half of the corporate capital.

As to article 1076, subsection I was revoked, and subsection II was amended. Thus, if previously clauses V and VI of article 1071 (amendment to the articles of association and merger, consolidation and dissolution, or termination of liquidation) required the votes of at least three-fourths (3/4) of the capital stock for resolutions to be taken, they are now covered by the quorum of clause II, which requires the votes of more than half the capital stock.

Below is a comparative table of the changes:

PREVIOUS WORDING:

Article 1.061.  The appointment of non partner directors shall depend on the unanimous approval of the partners,as long as the capital has not been paid up, and by at least 2/3 (two thirds)after the capital has been paid up.

Article 1.076.  With the exception of the provisions of Article 1.061, the partners' resolutions will be made:
I - by the votes corresponding to at least three-fourths of the capital stockin the cases provided for in subsections V and VI of art. 1.071*;
II - by the votes corresponding to more than half of the capital stock, in the cases provided for in clauses II, III, IV and VIII of article 1071*.*.

NEW WORDING:

Article 1.061. The appointment of non partner managers will depend on the approval of at least 2/3 (two thirds) of the partnersas long as the capital has not been paid up, and on the approval of holders of quotas corresponding of quotas corresponding to more than half of the capitalafter the capital has been paid up.

Article 1.076.  With the exception of the provisions of art. 1.061, the partners' deliberations will be taken:
I - (repealed);
II - by the votes corresponding to more than half of the capital stock, in the cases provided for in items II, III, IV, V, VI and VIII of caput of art. 1.071 of this Code.

*Article 1.071. The following depend on the partners' deliberation, in addition to other matters indicated by law or in the Articles of Association: I - the approval of the management accounts; II - the appointment of managers, when made by separate act; III - the removal of managers; IV - the manner of their compensation, when not established in the Articles of Association; V - the modification of the articles of incorporation; VI - the incorporation, merger, and dissolution of the company, or the cessation of the liquidation state; VII - the appointment and dismissal of liquidators and the judgment of their accounts; VIII - the petition for concordata.

Finally, these changes will come into effect thirty (30) days after the official publication (09/22/2022).

By Liège Fernandes Vargas
CPDMA Team | Corporate law

Return

Recent posts

CVM lança o regime FÁCIL para ampliar o acesso de empresas de menor porte ao mercado de capitais

Em 3 de julho de 2025, a Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM) publicou as Resoluções CVM 231 e 232, instituindo o regime FÁCIL (Facilitação do Acesso ao Capital e Incentivos às Listagens). A iniciativa visa simplificar o ingresso de Companhias de Menor Porte (CMP) no mercado de capitais brasileiro, promovendo transparência regulatória e estabilidade jurídica, […]

Read more

Thayse Bortolomiol takes over as head of the Business Restructuring Area at CPDMA.

Attorney Thayse Bortolomiol takes over the coordination of CPDMA's Business Restructuring area, maintaining the technical and strategic standard that has built the firm's reputation in this field and continuing one of its most prominent areas of practice. With eight years of experience at CPDMA, Thayse has been directly involved in key initiatives led by the firm, gaining […]

Read more
Abuse of control power in corporations: limits and consequences

Nas sociedades anônimas, a figura do acionista controlador desempenha papel central na definição dos rumos estratégicos da companhia. Detentor do poder de eleger a maioria dos administradores e de influenciar as deliberações sociais, esse acionista possui uma posição de destaque que, embora legítima, deve ser exercida dentro dos limites legais e em consonância com os […]

Read more
STJ recognizes extrajudicial exclusion of partner based on private instrument, without registration with the Board of Trade

In a recent decision, the Third Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) upheld the extrajudicial exclusion of a partner based on a private instrument signed by all members of the company, even without registration with the Board of Trade.[1]

In the case under review, after the company's formation and registration, the partners signed a document called a "statute," [...]

Read more

STF suspends proceedings on the legality of service provision contracts across the country

The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has decided to suspend, nationwide, all legal proceedings that question the legality of service provision contracts, commonly known as “pejotização”. The decision, issued by Justice Gilmar Mendes, aims to standardize the interpretation on the matter and ensure legal certainty. The STF recognized the general repercussion of the issue when it […]

Read more

CPDMA's role was decisive in the Supreme Federal Court's ruling reaffirming the case law on the use of legal entities in labor relations.

Uma importante decisão proferida recentemente pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), a partir de atuação da equipe trabalhista Cesar Peres Dulac Müller Advogados, trouxe novamente à tona a relevância da observância aos precedentes vinculantes da Corte em matéria trabalhista, especialmente quanto à licitude de formas alternativas de contratação, como a prestação de serviços por pessoa jurídica — prática […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram