Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: February 22, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA team

STJ removes disregard of legal personality in tax execution

The incident does not apply to the 1st Panel if the Treasury is based on articles 134 and 135 of the CTN.

The 1st Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) discussed, this Thursday (2/21), whether an incident of disregard of legal personality (IDPJ) should be instituted in a tax foreclosure before the redirection of a tax debt to partners , administrators or other legal entities related to the debtor. In other words, should tax enforcement be stopped until the judge assesses whether third parties are in fact responsible for the debt?

The Panel unanimously decided that, as a rule, it is not possible to institute the incident in the cases of redirection provided for by the National Tax Code (CTN), or when third parties appear on the Active Debt Certificate (CDA) at the end of a tax administrative process that appreciated the responsibility.

The ministers emphasized articles nº 124 (item II), 134 and 135 of the CTN. That is, the IDPJ does not apply if the Treasury collects the debt from administrators, directors, partners and others when there is liquidation of the company, express legal determination, excess of powers or violation of law, contract or statute.

"As a rule, the IDPJ is not required. But, since the situation is not foreseen in the CTN's hypotheses, in my view there is a need to initiate the incident" (Minister Gurgel de Faria, rapporteur of the cases, during the trial).

The Panel discussed the controversy over the IDPJ, which does not require the presentation of a guarantee by taxpayers, within the scope of special appeals No. 1,775,269 and No. 1,173,201, analyzed together. The matter is unprecedented in the collegiate.

As an exception, the collegiate highlighted the hypothesis in which the National Treasury bases the collection wrongly on item I of article 124 of the CTN, which allows companies of the same economic group to be held liable when there is a common interest in the debtor's taxable event.

common interest

In the case of item I of article 124 of the CTN, the ministers pointed out that the common interest of the alleged joint and several liability in the occurrence of the taxable event must be proven. This is because, by itself, the fact that companies are part of an economic group does not characterize responsibility.

If, in the judge's opinion, the Treasury fails to demonstrate the common interest, the redirection could also be requested if the misuse of purpose or the patrimonial confusion of the companies is proven, based on article 50 of the Civil Code. In this case, the STJ understood that it is the IDPJ.

The first lawsuit (REsp No. 1,775,269) opposes the National Treasury and Agroindustrial Irmãos Dalla Costa, which sells beef, pork and poultry products. The Farm executed the agro-industry to answer for a debt of R$ 100 million in PIS and Cofins charged to a company with a similar corporate purpose and belonging to the same economic group, whose partners are a father and three children.

However, the company to which the debt was redirected did not exist at the time of the events giving rise to the contributions. Thus, the ministers of the 1st Panel understood that the Treasury improperly based the request on article 124.

“The company did not even exist at the time of the triggering event. So the common interest could not be glimpsed at that time. In view of this specificity of the specific case, I am observing that here it is effectively necessary to establish the incident”, said Minister Gurgel de Faria during the trial.

Thus, in the specific case, the STJ overturned the decision of the second instance and determined that the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region (TRF4) institute the IDPJ before redirecting the tax execution.

In practice

The incident of disregard of legal personality was introduced by the new Civil Procedure Code (CPC), of 2015. The National Treasury emphasizes that the matter has special relevance in smaller cities, in the interior of the country, without specialized tax enforcement courts.

Risk is the squandering of assets, says Fazenda

As the IDPJ does not require a debt guarantee and can last for years, during this period the Treasury warns that the executed third parties can hide or dispose of the assets, in order to avoid the attachment or blocking of properties, bank accounts and other assets. “[The IDPJ] can last for years. Until then, you can squander your heritage. And it is a way to present a defense in the execution without guarantee”, warned prosecutor Gabriel Matos Bahia, from the National Treasury.

However, the Treasury usually requests redirection, mainly based on article 135 of the CTN, which deals with acts performed with excess of powers or violation of law, contract or statute. In the case of this article, the STJ decided that the IDPJ does not fit in the tax execution, since the responsibility is provided for in the law.

Source: Jamile Racanicci via Jota.


recent posts

STF decides that collective rule that restricts labor rights is constitutional

STF decides that collective rule that restricts labor law is constitutional. The Court observed, however, that the reduction of rights by Collective Agreements or Conventions must respect the guarantees constitutionally guaranteed to workers. The Federal Supreme Court ruled that Collective Bargaining Agreements or Agreements that limit or suppress labor rights are valid, provided that […]

Read more
The eviction action in the judicial recovery

Companies that file a judicial recovery action and have their activities carried out in leased properties may, in the event of default, face an eviction action, even if the credit is listed in the creditors list. On this topic, there are some very important issues being dealt with in the courts regarding the suspension of the demand and about the resumption of the asset during the period of processing of the judicial reorganization.

Read more
Law to reduce bureaucracy of Public Records passed

On June 27th, Law nº 14. 382/2022 was enacted, whose main objective is the creation of the Electronic System of Public Records (SERP), which aims to unify the systems of notary offices throughout the country, reducing the bureaucracy of the national notary system ( the measure covers the registrations of real estate, titles and civil documents of natural persons and […]

Read more
Bidding law and the use of Dispute Boards

In large-scale contracts, complexity, amounts involved, and time are common causes of conflict between the parties. An effective option to help prevent and resolve these disputes is called a dispute board. This method, unlike mediation, arbitration and conciliation, consists of creating a council of technicians, appointed […]

Read more
Tax Benefits to the Events Sector - PERSE Law

The restrictive measures adopted worldwide to minimize the spread of Covid-19 have undeniably brought significant impacts to various sectors of the economy. The determination of isolation or quarantine to face the pandemic, the most effective measure to reduce the circulation of the contagious agent, has made the sector of culture and entertainment events […]

Read more
CVM Resolution No. 80 and the dissonance with the secrecy inherent to arbitration proceedings

In force since May 2, 2022, CVM Resolution No. 80 brings a new notice on corporate demands, regulating the registration and provision of periodic and occasional information from the issuers of securities. Such regulation was the subject of Public Hearing 1/21 and consolidated the content of Instructions No. 367 and 480 […]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram