Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: January 27, 2021
Posted by: CPDMA Team

STJ will judge limitation of the basis for calculating contributions to the S System

The Superior Court of Justice will judge the limitation of 20 minimum wages of the basis for calculating contributions to third parties (Sistema S, INCRA and Salario Educação). This is a discussion involving the limits on which charges on the payroll of companies may apply.

The taxpayers maintain that Law 6.950/1981 establishes the limit of 20 times the minimum wage in force, as a ceiling for the calculation of said contributions, which is not being observed by the tax inspection. This is because the Tax Authorities understand that this limit was excluded from the legal system through a Decree-Law dated 1986 and, therefore, should no longer be respected, and the payroll can be fully taxed with contributions to third parties.

There has already been a manifestation of the STJ on the matter, on two occasions, and on both occasions the Court has manifested itself for the validity of the limitation of 20 minimum wages, that is, it has given the taxpayers the right. Now, the difference is that the decision will be issued in the context of repetitive appeals and, with that, it will have the power to affect the decisions of all other spheres of the judiciary, linking them to the position of the STJ.

Faced with this scenario, companies that have a high number of employees must seek judicially to exercise their right in order to limit the incidence of contributions to the S System, INCRA and Salario Educação, as well as to obtain the right to recover the amounts unduly paid in the last five years.

The impact of applying the limit is considerable, since contributions to third parties represent an encumbrance of around 5.8% on the entire payroll paid monthly by the company. In this way, the application of the thesis can represent a relief of monthly cash, especially for those companies that have a high number of employees on the payroll, for which the limit of 20 minimum wages will be extremely relevant when calculating, calculating and collecting the incidental contributions. on the payroll.

The Cesar Peres Dullac Müller Advocacia Empresarial team is at your disposal to deal with this and other tax issues that can directly affect your company's profitability.

Source: Wagner Arnold Fensterseifer, attorney at Cesar Peres Dulac Müller, is a specialist in Tax Law and a Master in Philosophy of Law.

Return

Recent posts

Creditors' Alternative Plan in the Judicial Reorganization of Rural Producers

No 3º Congresso Cerealista Brasileiro, contribuímos para ampliar o debate sobre as alternativas disponíveis aos credores diante do avanço da recuperação judicial no agronegócio. A apresentação conduzida por Thomas Dulac Müller, sócio-diretor da CPDMA, destacou os principais pontos de atenção para cerealistas e demais agentes da cadeia, com foco na organização coletiva, na atuação estratégica em […]

Read more
Lease agreements: attention to the deadlines of the Transitional Regime under the Tax Reform

The Tax Reform, provided for in the Federal Constitution (art. 156-A), in Complementary Bill No. 108/2024, and in Complementary Law No. 214/2025, had as its main goal to transform the consumption taxation system in Brazil. Five complex taxes were eliminated — PIS, Cofins, IPI, ICMS, and ISS — which will be replaced by […]

Read more

STJ upholds acquisition for any price in the 3rd round of the bankruptcy auction and rejects claims of an unfairly low price

A Terceira Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) proferiu uma decisão de grande impacto no Direito Empresarial e Processual, validando a arrematação de um imóvel de massa falida por apenas 2% de sua avaliação. Esta decisão é fundamental e reforça a prioridade da Lei de Falências (Lei nº 11.101/2005, atualizada pela Lei nº 14.112/2020) […]

Read more
New STJ ruling: protection for co-owners in cases of attachment and auction of indivisible assets

Em recente julgamento (REsp 2.180.611-DF), a Terceira Turma do STJ estabeleceu um entendimento crucial que visa proteger o patrimônio do coproprietário ou cônjuge, em caso de penhora e arrematação de bens indivisíveis, que não tem responsabilidade pela dívida (o alheio à execução). O que mudou e o que você precisa saber? A lei (Código de Processo Civil - […]

Read more
Selic is the applicable interest rate for late payment in civil debts, rules the STJ

O Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) firmou um importante entendimento no Tema Repetitivo 1368 sobre a taxa de juros de mora aplicável a dívidas de natureza civil no Brasil, antes da vigência da Lei n.º 14.905/2024. --- A tese firmada: o STJ estabeleceu que o artigo 406 do Código Civil de 2002 (em sua redação anterior à Lei […]

Read more

Rural sale-and-leaseback: liquidity for companies in crisis and protected returns for investors

No agronegócio brasileiro, a busca por capital rápido em meio à escalada dos juros fez crescer uma estrutura já conhecida no mercado imobiliário urbano: o sale-and-leaseback. A lógica é direta: o produtor vende a área rural a um investidor, recebe o dinheiro à vista e, no mesmo ato, assina um contrato de arrendamento a longo prazo […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram