Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 28 de November de 2024
Posted by: CPDMA Team

The STJ decides that stock options (option to purchase shares or quotas) cannot be seized.

Tela de computador mostrando trending view de stock options.

On November 5, the 3rd Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice decided, through the judgment of REsp 1841466[1], reported by Minister Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, on the impossibility of seizing stock options. The judgment focused on the possibility of a third party exercising the right to purchase shares in a company as a result of the seizure.

The Chamber unanimously understood that the granting of a purchase option is a personal right and, therefore, can only be exercised by the beneficiary who signed the corresponding document to the share purchase plan.

 

In the case in question, a financial institution was enforcing a credit against an individual who held a grant of a purchase option from the company where they worked. The purchase option was granted under an incentive plan for employees, allowing them to become shareholders of their own employer in the future. During the enforcement proceedings, the court of first instance approved the seizure of the right arising from the stock options contract, thereby enabling the creditor to acquire shares of the company where the debtor is employed.

The state court overturned the decision, understanding that the seizure of the right to purchase shares does not authorize the creditor to exercise the right. According to the reasoning of the referred court, the granted purchase option has no economic value, and if the seizure were to be enforced, it should apply only to any shares acquired by the debtor after the purchase right was exercised. In other words, the creditor could not exercise the right to purchase shares in place of the debtor.

 

In line with the court's position, the STJ decided to deny the special appeal filed by the financial institution, understanding that if the debtor did not exercise the acquisition right, which was their prerogative, the assets (shares) did not become part of their private estate, remaining solely as a benefit within the scope of the acquisition right, which is of a personal nature.

This recent ruling represents an important precedent, recognizing the personal right granted to the employee and preserving the interests of the company. The decision reinforces the impossibility of acquiring shares through coercive means, outside the corporate and business framework, avoiding potential harm to the company's strategic plans and promoting stability and integration among shareholders, administrators, and employees.

By: Liège Fernandes Vargas

Corporate Law | CPDMA Team


[1] 

SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 1841466 - SP (2018/0304603-4), 3rd Chamber, Superior Court of Justice, Rapporteur Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, judged on November 5, 2024.

Return

Recent posts

The STJ decides that stock options (option to purchase shares or quotas) cannot be seized.

On November 5th, the 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice ruled, through the judgment of REsp 1841466[1], under the rapporteurship of Minister Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, on the impossibility of seizing stock options. The case focused on the possibility of a third party exercising the right to purchase shares in […]

Read more

Governance in family businesses: essential structures and instruments

A governança corporativa em empresas familiares tem ganhado cada vez mais relevância no cenário empresarial brasileiro, no qual cerca de 90% das empresas possuem controle familiar. A ausência de um planejamento adequado para a sucessão do negócio e a dificuldade de manter a harmonia nas relações familiares, em muitos casos, culminam no fracasso da empresa […]

Read more
Resolution No. 586/2024 of the CNJ and the Future of Agreements in Labor Justice

On 09/30/2024, the National Council of Justice (CNJ) unanimously approved Resolution No. 586 through Normative Act 0005870-16.2024.2.00.0000, which regulates the agreement between employee and employer in the termination of the employment contract, through approval by the Labor Justice system, with full settlement of the contract. In other words, […]

Read more
The Legitimacy of Associations and Foundations to Request Judicial Reorganization and the New Stance of the STJ.

At the beginning of October, the 3rd Panel of the STJ, by majority vote, issued a decision in four special appeals (REsp 2.026.250, REsp 2.036.410, REsp 2.038.048, and REsp 2.155.284), ruling against the active legitimacy of nonprofit foundations to request Judicial Reorganization. This unprecedented decision appears, at first glance, […]

Read more
Government of RS Establishes Recovery Program II: Installment Plan for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection

The Government of the State of Rio Grande do Sul has instituted the Recovery Program II through Decree No. 57,884 of October 22, 2024, with the objective of allowing the installment of tax and non-tax debts for entrepreneurs or business entities under bankruptcy protection, including taxpayers whose bankruptcy […]

Read more
Renegotiation of BRL 60 Billion in Debt for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection Regularized by PGFN

With information from Valor Econômico newspaper. Original article link: http://glo.bo/3NOicuU Since 2020, the Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN) has been advancing negotiations to regularize debts of companies under bankruptcy protection, resulting in the renegotiation of approximately BRL 60 billion. The number of regularized companies has tripled, reaching 30% of cases, thanks to a more collaborative approach from the […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram