Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: March 11, 2021
Posted by: CPDMA Team

The practice of "sandbagging" in M&A contracts

According to a survey carried out by large auditing companies, involving the number of mergers and acquisitions or M&A transactions. Mergers and Acquisitions) in Brazil, the years 2017, 2018 and 2019, consecutively, were extremely significant. To give you an idea, 2019 had been considered the most expressive in mergers and acquisitions of companies in Brazil in the entire historical series.

In 2020, with the rapid advance of COVID-19, several economic sectors were hit, which led to a strong impact on the level of business activities across the planet.

Despite this complex global scenario, according to a recent survey published by PWC, in 2020, 1038 M&A transactions were announced in Brazil, a volume 48% higher than the average for the same period of the last 5 years (701 transactions), with an increase of 14% compared to the previous year (912 transactions). 

In 2020, therefore, there was a record of the historical series (which, until then, had been reached in December 2019), reinforcing a trend of accelerated recovery of the M&A market, strongly affected by the effects of COVID-19 between April and June 2020. 2020

In this context, the State of São Paulo concentrated approximately 50% of the transactions announced in 2020, represented by 521 transactions (2019 - 466 transactions), with 448 transactions in the metropolitan region of São Paulo and 73 in regions of the interior of São Paulo. In the South Region, 168 transactions were announced, an increase of 24% compared to the same period in 2019 (135 transactions).

It is worth noting that the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) process has many steps and can take anywhere from 3 months to several years to complete. Such transactions are among the most complex and significant events in the life of a company - the consequences of which reverberate internally and externally.

And, for this reason, the contract that governs these operations, commonly known as SPA (acronym in English for Share Purchase Agreement), is one of the fundamental parts of this complex gear.

Among the numerous clauses provided for in an SPA, it is worth mentioning, in brief, some considerations in relation to those that comprise the declarations (representations) and guarantees (warranties) provided by the seller and, consequently, the possible practice of sandbagging.

It can be said that, in an ordinary M&A contract, it is extremely common for the seller to make an extensive list of statements of fact that, if proven incorrect or untrue, entitle the buyer to compensation. On the other hand, from the seller's point of view, as important as the representations and warranties for the buyer, are the exceptions to the representations and warranties that are already known and informed by the seller to the buyer (disclosures), and, in theory, , may or may not be embedded in the transaction price.

Thus, the purpose of these representations and warranties is to minimize the asymmetry of information between seller and buyer, assuring the acquirer the right to indemnification in case the information disclosed by the seller in the contract is not true or accurate, in whole or in part, regarding the good or acquired right and the costs, expenses and contingencies linked to it.

However, in certain situations, it is possible that the buyer, even aware of information that represents a violation of the respective declaration and guarantee, allows the negotiation to continue until the SPA is signed or the transaction is closed, in order to subsequently claim the respective indemnification. provided for in the contract, based on this same breach.

This buyer's conduct is called in the Anglo-Saxon system of sandbagging. The origin of the term sandbagging has been the subject of some speculation. Glenn D. West and Kim M. Shah suggest that the term may have derived from the use of a sandbag as a weapon, often in a surprise attack. On the other hand, there are authors who claim that the expression is used in golf to designate the player who pretends to be worse than he really is in order to gain advantages over his opponents, increasing his chances of winning.

For Rick Climan, the term sandbagging is used to describe a buyer who, knowing of a material breach of a seller's warranty, would wait for the transaction to close, then sue the seller on the basis of this breach. That is, instead of the buyer negotiating a price reduction or withdrawing from the operation, due to the breach of the guarantee, he awaits the closing of the transaction to request compensation for the material breach of the guarantee.

As can be seen, the issue is complex and does not find an easy solution, even when analyzed from the perspective of comparative law. In the United States, where this issue appears with high frequency, it is possible to identify different positions on the subject, depending on the jurisdiction that analyzes the specific case. On the one hand, there are those who follow the traditional rule anti-sandbagging (California), while others (New York and Delaware) tend to follow the trend. pro-sandbagging Modern.

According to Ricardo Morais Tonin, in jurisdictions that adopt the traditional rule anti-sandbagging, the buyer must have relied on the declaration and warranty, and therefore, if he knew of the breach, there was no such reliance at the time he decided to sign (signing) or close (closing) the operation. On the other hand, in jurisdictions pro-sandbagging, the purchaser will be able to maintain its right to indemnification based on contractual principles, whether or not it is aware of it at closing.

In Brazil, discussions involving the practice of sandbagging are increasingly common in M&A contracts. It is necessary, however, to analyze this issue from the perspective of objective good faith and the ethics that must underlie business relations. In any case, there is no way to avoid the necessary attention on the part of the seller and the buyer, both when drawing up the contract and in the execution of its clauses. Accurate analysis and careful monitoring of the entire M&A process are essential for success in this type of corporate transaction.

Source: Geovane Machado Alves, attorney at Cesar Peres Dulac Müller, is a Master in Public Law and a specialist in Tax Law.


Recent posts

Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.

On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]

Read more
The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]

Read more
Business position on the recent STF decision that ruled that it is constitutional for trade unions to charge assistance contributions

Recently, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) unanimously ruled that unions can collect an assistance contribution, including from non-member employees, in ARE 1.18.459 (Topic 935 of the General Repercussion), as long as the worker is guaranteed the right to object, establishing the following thesis: "it is constitutional to establish, by agreement or [...]

Read more
The new chapter in the legal dispute involving the term "HELLES", registered as a 'trademark'.

Recalling the case... It all started at the beginning of 2019, when the brewery Fassbier gave extrajudicial notice to a series of breweries in Rio Grande do Sul for the alleged misuse of the term HELLES, claiming to have exclusive use of the expression, given that the word was registered as a trademark. Not satisfied with [...]

Read more
Suspension of labor executions against companies in the same economic group

In a recent decision, the STF suspended the processing of labor executions that discuss the inclusion, in the execution phase, of a company that is part of an economic group that did not participate in the knowledge process. In labor proceedings, when the execution phase is reached and the main debtor does not have enough assets to pay the debt, many [...]

Read more
STJ decides that the legal personality of a civil association can be disregarded, but limits liability to the directors

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) [1] dismissed a special appeal filed by the directors of a civil association, which had its legal personality disregarded in a case involving the improper use of a trademark. The Court, in a judgment drafted by Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze, held that the disregard of [...]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram