Nas sociedades anônimas, a figura do acionista controlador desempenha papel central na definição dos rumos estratégicos da companhia. Detentor do poder de eleger a maioria dos administradores e de influenciar as deliberações sociais, esse acionista possui uma posição de destaque que, embora legítima, deve ser exercida dentro dos limites legais e em consonância com os […]
CPDMA BLOG
Category: News
Date: 19 de February de 2024
Posted by: CPDMA Team
Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.
On February 14, the magazine "Valor Econômico", an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the undue use of a trademark by a former partner.
The news item, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a partnership agreement in the footwear business, having started activities in 2018. It so happens that after leaving the company, the ex-partner started using the trademark in another business, in the same field of activity, using the name in internet domains and social networks, as well as registering the trademark as if it were her own. The case was judged in favor of the plaintiff in the first degree and had the decision confirmed in the second degree, justifying that, although the defendant had registered the trademark first, unfair competition should not be ruled out, given that the trademark is widely related to the plaintiff, applying the parameter of anteriority established by the STJ.
"Given the use of such an expression in a precedent and consolidated manner, it is conceivable that the opposing party could not use the same designation in the same marketing niche, whether in a physical or virtual establishment by any means, as such conduct involves abuse of rights and unfair competition, since it gives rise to undue association between suppliers and confusion for the consumer public," said Reporting Judge Azuma Nishi.
Although it was not analyzed in the decision commented on here, the situation could, in theory, constitute bad faith on the part of the defendant. Based on article 124, item XXIII of Industrial Property Law 9.279/96, it could not register a sign that reproduced, in whole or in part, a trademark that it clearly could not have been unaware of due to its activity, even more so in the case of a former partner, since the trademark is intended to distinguish an identical, similar or related product or service that is likely to cause confusion or association with another's trademark, as is the case here.
Intellectual Property | CPDMA Team
Recent posts
STJ recognizes extrajudicial exclusion of partner based on private instrument, without registration with the Board of Trade
Read more
In a recent decision, the Third Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) upheld the extrajudicial exclusion of a partner based on a private instrument signed by all members of the company, even without registration with the Board of Trade.[1]
In the case under review, after the company's formation and registration, the partners signed a document called a "statute," [...]
STF suspends proceedings on the legality of service provision contracts across the country
The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has decided to suspend, nationwide, all legal proceedings that question the legality of service provision contracts, commonly known as “pejotização”. The decision, issued by Justice Gilmar Mendes, aims to standardize the interpretation on the matter and ensure legal certainty. The STF recognized the general repercussion of the issue when it […]
CPDMA's role was decisive in the Supreme Federal Court's ruling reaffirming the case law on the use of legal entities in labor relations.
Uma importante decisão proferida recentemente pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), a partir de atuação da equipe trabalhista Cesar Peres Dulac Müller Advogados, trouxe novamente à tona a relevância da observância aos precedentes vinculantes da Corte em matéria trabalhista, especialmente quanto à licitude de formas alternativas de contratação, como a prestação de serviços por pessoa jurídica — prática […]
Annual meeting for accounts review
The annual holding of the Ordinary General Meeting (OGM) for the accountability of the administrators is a legal requirement provided for in Law No. 6,404/1976 (Brazilian Corporations Law), specifically in Articles 132 and following. This provision establishes that the OGM must take place within the first four (4) months following the end of the fiscal year, usually by […]
The Full Bench of the Superior Labor Court rules on new binding precedents
The Full Bench of the Superior Labor Court, in a session held this Monday (24), established legal theses on new topics, as part of a procedure to reaffirm its jurisprudence. These are matters that, as they are already settled, were submitted to the repetitive appeals procedure to define a binding legal thesis. The establishment of qualified precedents has a direct impact […]
English 
Português do Brasil 
Español