Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: October 30, 2020
Posted by: CPDMA team

Cram down: alternative method for approving the judicial reorganization plan

Law 11,101/2005 brought specific requirements for the approval of the judicial reorganization plan, seeking balance between creditors and protection of social interest. According to the legal provision, the plan may be approved if there is no objection from the creditors, or when approved by the majority at a general meeting of creditors pursuant to art. 45 of the LRF. However, if approval is not achieved in any of the first two stages, it may still be imposed on creditors by the system known as cram down.

cram down (down the throat) is an imposition of the public power on creditors to protect the interest of the mass of creditors, the social interest and protect viable companies. Coming from US legislation, more specifically in Section 1129 (b) of Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code, the Brazilian system is criticized by the doctrine for being known as a closed system much more rigorous than that of “Uncle Sam”.

This is because the national system only sought an alternative way of approving the recovery plan, reducing the necessary quorum and changing objective criteria, while the cram down American, looks at broader issues such as the prohibition of unjustified discrimination - does not discriminate unfairly- and that, necessarily, the plan is fair and equitable - fair and equitable.

In our system, the cram down may occur when the restructuring plan is approved by at least half of the creditor classes (labor, collateral, unsecured or ME/EPP) and, cumulatively, there must be approval of more than half of all credits participating in the general meeting of creditors . 

Law 11,101/2005 also brings two other requirements: the first requires that the class that rejects the plan has at least 1/3 favorable votes (calculated per head and/or per credit, depending on the class) and the second, and last , requires that this class not be treated differently among creditors. Once the four requirements are met, the judge in the case must consider the approved recovery plan.

However, in some cases, this quorum will be impossible to reach. This occurs, for example, when there are only one or two creditors in the class, which makes it impossible to have a simple quorum (per head) of 1/3 or, when one of the creditors holds more than 70% of the claims, which makes it impossible to reach 1/3 of the value of the credits.

In these cases, for the most part, the jurisprudence has been disqualifying the negative vote to the plan, that is, under the argument of abuse of the right or, even, simply by applying the principle of preservation of the company, the negative vote is removed from the calculation, leaving on the basis of sufficient votes to reach a quorum for the cram down.

Source: Wagner Luís Machado, attorney at Cesar Peres Dulac Müller, specializes in Business Law.

Return

recent posts

STF decides that collective rule that restricts labor rights is constitutional

STF decides that collective rule that restricts labor law is constitutional. The Court observed, however, that the reduction of rights by Collective Agreements or Conventions must respect the guarantees constitutionally guaranteed to workers. The Federal Supreme Court ruled that Collective Bargaining Agreements or Agreements that limit or suppress labor rights are valid, provided that […]

Read more
The eviction action in the judicial recovery

Companies that file a judicial recovery action and have their activities carried out in leased properties may, in the event of default, face an eviction action, even if the credit is listed in the creditors list. On this topic, there are some very important issues being dealt with in the courts regarding the suspension of the demand and about the resumption of the asset during the period of processing of the judicial reorganization.

Read more
Law to reduce bureaucracy of Public Records passed

On June 27th, Law nº 14. 382/2022 was enacted, whose main objective is the creation of the Electronic System of Public Records (SERP), which aims to unify the systems of notary offices throughout the country, reducing the bureaucracy of the national notary system ( the measure covers the registrations of real estate, titles and civil documents of natural persons and […]

Read more
Bidding law and the use of Dispute Boards

In large-scale contracts, complexity, amounts involved, and time are common causes of conflict between the parties. An effective option to help prevent and resolve these disputes is called a dispute board. This method, unlike mediation, arbitration and conciliation, consists of creating a council of technicians, appointed […]

Read more
Tax Benefits to the Events Sector - PERSE Law

The restrictive measures adopted worldwide to minimize the spread of Covid-19 have undeniably brought significant impacts to various sectors of the economy. The determination of isolation or quarantine to face the pandemic, the most effective measure to reduce the circulation of the contagious agent, has made the sector of culture and entertainment events […]

Read more
CVM Resolution No. 80 and the dissonance with the secrecy inherent to arbitration proceedings

In force since May 2, 2022, CVM Resolution No. 80 brings a new notice on corporate demands, regulating the registration and provision of periodic and occasional information from the issuers of securities. Such regulation was the subject of Public Hearing 1/21 and consolidated the content of Instructions No. 367 and 480 […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram