Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: October 30, 2020
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Cram down: alternative method for approving the judicial reorganization plan

Law 11,101/2005 brought specific requirements for the approval of the judicial reorganization plan, seeking balance between creditors and protection of social interest. According to the legal provision, the plan may be approved if there is no objection from the creditors, or when approved by the majority at a general meeting of creditors pursuant to art. 45 of the LRF. However, if approval is not achieved in any of the first two stages, it may still be imposed on creditors by the system known as cram down.

The cram down (down the throat) is an imposition of the public power on creditors to protect the interest of the mass of creditors, the social interest and protect viable companies. Coming from US legislation, more specifically in Section 1129 (b) of Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code, the Brazilian system is criticized by the doctrine for being known as a closed system much more rigorous than that of “Uncle Sam”.

This is because the national system only sought an alternative way of approving the recovery plan, reducing the necessary quorum and changing objective criteria, while the cram down American, looks at broader issues such as the prohibition of unjustified discrimination - does not discriminate unfairly- and that, necessarily, the plan is fair and equitable - fair and equitable.

In our system, the cram down may occur when the restructuring plan is approved by at least half of the creditor classes (labor, collateral, unsecured or ME/EPP) and, cumulatively, there must be approval of more than half of all credits participating in the general meeting of creditors . 

Law 11,101/2005 also brings two other requirements: the first requires that the class that rejects the plan has at least 1/3 favorable votes (calculated per head and/or per credit, depending on the class) and the second, and last , requires that this class not be treated differently among creditors. Once the four requirements are met, the judge in the case must consider the approved recovery plan.

However, in some cases, this quorum will be impossible to reach. This occurs, for example, when there are only one or two creditors in the class, which makes it impossible to have a simple quorum (per head) of 1/3 or, when one of the creditors holds more than 70% of the claims, which makes it impossible to reach 1/3 of the value of the credits.

In these cases, for the most part, the jurisprudence has been disqualifying the negative vote to the plan, that is, under the argument of abuse of the right or, even, simply by applying the principle of preservation of the company, the negative vote is removed from the calculation, leaving on the basis of sufficient votes to reach a quorum for the cram down.

Source: Wagner Luís Machado, attorney at Cesar Peres Dulac Müller, specializes in Business Law.


Recent posts

Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.

On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]

Read more
The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]

Read more
Business position on the recent STF decision that ruled that it is constitutional for trade unions to charge assistance contributions

Recently, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) unanimously ruled that unions can collect an assistance contribution, including from non-member employees, in ARE 1.18.459 (Topic 935 of the General Repercussion), as long as the worker is guaranteed the right to object, establishing the following thesis: "it is constitutional to establish, by agreement or [...]

Read more
The new chapter in the legal dispute involving the term "HELLES", registered as a 'trademark'.

Recalling the case... It all started at the beginning of 2019, when the brewery Fassbier gave extrajudicial notice to a series of breweries in Rio Grande do Sul for the alleged misuse of the term HELLES, claiming to have exclusive use of the expression, given that the word was registered as a trademark. Not satisfied with [...]

Read more
Suspension of labor executions against companies in the same economic group

In a recent decision, the STF suspended the processing of labor executions that discuss the inclusion, in the execution phase, of a company that is part of an economic group that did not participate in the knowledge process. In labor proceedings, when the execution phase is reached and the main debtor does not have enough assets to pay the debt, many [...]

Read more
STJ decides that the legal personality of a civil association can be disregarded, but limits liability to the directors

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) [1] dismissed a special appeal filed by the directors of a civil association, which had its legal personality disregarded in a case involving the improper use of a trademark. The Court, in a judgment drafted by Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze, held that the disregard of [...]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram