Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 25 de October de 2022
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Appeal deposits must be made available to the Judicial Reorganization Court

Foto do advogado Rafael Franzoi que ilustra o artigo sobre depósitos recursais.

Until the beginning of the Law 13.467/2017 - known as the Labor Reform - for a company under judicial reorganization to appeal a judgment or decision before the labor courts, it was required to pay the appeal deposit and procedural costs.

The new legislation, however, now provides that companies under judicial reorganization are exempt from paying the appeal deposit, so that, from then on (i.e., from the granting of the judicial reorganization proceeding), discussions about the dispensability of such deposits must be considered overruled.

A distinct issue, however, is that regarding the destination of the amounts of the appeal deposits made prior to the granting of the judicial reorganization.

The judicial rehabilitation process is a procedure that seeks to restructure a company in crisis by organizing its debts in order to avoid its collapse.

During the course of the labor lawsuit, it is common to see companies going into receivership and requesting that the amounts at the disposal of the labor court be released for use in the receivership plan.

This is because once judicial reorganization processing is granted, the Labor Courts no longer has jurisdiction to perform any acts involving the assets of the reorganized company, including amounts related to appeal deposits made to guarantee the labor court before granting of the judicial reorganization petition.

This is the solidified jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), and the seventh panel of the Superior Labor Court (TST), reaffirmed the same understanding, in a judgment handed down on 06/10/2022:

"DEFENDANT'S REVIEW APPEAL. LAW NO. 13.467/2017. EXECUTION. RELEASE OF APPEAL DEPOSITS FROM LABOR CREDIT. COMPANY UNDER JUDICIAL REORGANIZATION. COMPETENCE OF THE UNIVERSAL COURT. POLITICAL TRANSCENDENCE VERIFIED. The competence of the Labor Court, in relation to labor debts of companies in bankruptcy or judicial reorganization, is limited to the definition and quantification of employees' rights. All amounts collected, including those relating to any appeal deposits, must be made available to the Universal Court. Precedents. Appeal known and granted. (RR-11966-59.2014.5.03.0163, 7th Panel, Reporting Justice Cláudio Mascarenhas Brandão, DEJT 10/06/2022).

The Second Panel of the Superior Labor Court has also taken a position on the matter:

"COMPANY UNDER JUDICIAL REORGANIZATION. IMPOSSIBILITY OF RELEASING APPEAL DEPOSITS TO THE PLAINTIFF EVEN IF MADE PRIOR TO THE GRANTING OF THE REORGANIZATION. AMOUNTS THAT MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE UNIVERSAL COURT. The assets owned by the company under judicial reorganization eventually seized by the labor court must be made available to the Universal Court, which includes the appeal and judicial deposits made by it in these proceedings, even if made before the judicial reorganization was granted. Review appeal known and provided." (RR-21934-97.2014.5.04.0030, 2nd Panel, Reporting Justice Maria Helena Mallmann, DEJT 03/25/2022).

In other words, the competence of the labor court is extinguished with the quantification of the claimant's credit, which must then be qualified in the judicial reorganization process.

It is important to point out that there is a trend that defends that, once the amounts are no longer available to the company, it could not demand their use in the reorganization plan, which is why this request should be denied.

The impossibility of expropriation of assets of the company under reorganization by the labor court, however, is not limited to assets found after the reorganization process. In fact, all the assets still owned by the company may be used in the reorganization plan, and the deposit amounts - which are nothing more than court guarantees - still belong to the company.

Thus, it is up to the labor court to observe the destination set by the reorganization court, including sending the amounts to the Common Justice, as the case may be.

This jurisprudential understanding is absolutely praiseworthy, and is applicable to lawsuits in both the appeal and liquidation phases, so that the amounts related to the appeal deposits are made available to the court-ordered turnaround, the only court with jurisdiction to define the destination of the assets of the company under reorganization.

By: Rafael Franzoi

CPDMA Team - Labor

Return

Recent posts

STJ and the Validity of the Discount for Labor Creditors: Our Role in the Concreserv Case

The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has begun the trial of a crucial issue for business law and judicial recovery in Brazil: the possibility of applying a discount on labor claims and creating subclasses within this category. The case under review involves the judicial recovery of the company Concreserv, which established a 90% discount on amounts exceeding 25 […]

Read more
Salary Transparency Report – Submission Deadline until February 28, 2025

Companies with 100 or more employees can now submit information for the Salary Transparency Report from February 3 to February 28, 2025, through the Emprega Brasil portal, in the employers' section. On the portal, companies must report whether they have a job and salary plan or a career plan, policies to encourage the hiring of women (such as Black women, women with disabilities, victims of violence, heads of households, and LGBTQIA+), actions to promote women to management and leadership positions, programs to support the sharing of family responsibilities, as well as the salary criteria for career progression.

Read more
Commercial Registries Now Require Publications of Corporate Acts: Understand the Changes

In recent months, several Commercial Registries in Brazil have begun requiring the publication of acts related to mergers, spin-offs, and incorporations of companies, as established in the Civil Code (Articles 1,122 and 1,152, §1) and the Corporate Law (Articles 227, §3, 228, §3, and 229, §4). Although these obligations were already stipulated by law, many […]

Read more
RS authorized to implement ICMS settlement and installment payment with reduction of interest and fines

The National Council of Fiscal Policy - CONFAZ, aiming to facilitate the regularization of taxpayers' tax debts, has authorized the implementation of a program for the settlement and installment payment of ICMS debts in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, whether or not they are registered as outstanding debt, assessed, or subject to legal proceedings. The program provides for a […]

Read more
Atenção às tentativas de golpes utilizando o nome Cesar Peres Dullac Müller Advogados

Reiteramos nosso compromisso contínuo em oferecer serviços jurídicos com excelência e segurança. Diante disso, alertamos sobre uma situação delicada que tem ocorrido no setor jurídico: recentemente, tomamos conhecimento de tentativas de golpes direcionadas a clientes de escritórios de advocacia. Gostaríamos de tranquilizá-los, assegurando que todas as suas informações processuais e pessoais permanecem integralmente protegidas. Esses […]

Read more
The STJ decides that stock options (option to purchase shares or quotas) cannot be seized.

On November 5th, the 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice ruled, through the judgment of REsp 1841466[1], under the rapporteurship of Minister Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, on the impossibility of seizing stock options. The case focused on the possibility of a third party exercising the right to purchase shares in […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram