Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 14 de December de 2023
Posted by: CPDMA Team

The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

Artigo de Juliana Bloise sobre a LGPD.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law no. 13.709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, to comply with the new regulations.

Initially, sanctions and administrative fines were imposed by consumer protection agencies (PROCON), the Public Prosecutor's Office, as well as labor and civil lawsuits, until the National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) began its inspection activities in 2021.

At first, the ANPD worked to raise awareness and educate data processors about the importance of applying good practices in the processing of personal data, in the pursuit of the fundamental right to informational self-determination (EC No. 115/22).

The personal data protection system was put into effect when the first administrative sanctions were applied by the regulatory agency.

The first company fined is a provider of telephony services, such as telemarketing and self-service via the messaging service WhatsApp. Because it is a micro-enterprise, the amount for each infraction was limited to 2% of its gross revenue, totaling R$7,200.00 per infraction.

The company was fined for failing to appoint the person responsible for processing personal data, as required by art. 41 of the LGPD, and for processing personal data without a legal basis: the company processed voters' personal data for the purposes of an election campaign, without the express consent of the data subjects, as required by art. 7, II, of the LGPD.

The Santa Catarina State Health Department (SES-SC) was the second public company to receive sanctions from the ANPD. Four warning sanctions were imposed for leaking personal data.

SES-SC infringed art. 49 of the General Personal Data Protection Act (LGPD) by neglecting the security of systems for storing and processing personal data, and by the lack of clarity, inadequacy and timeliness of the notice to data subjects, which was considered an infringement of art. 48 of the LGPD. In addition, the agency failed to submit the Personal Data Protection Impact Report (RIPD) requested by the Authority.

It should be noted that the sanctions imposed on companies are attributed to the lack of proper documents and procedures.

Thus, contractual compliance and the creation of standardized documents, without the implementation of effective practices, are not enough to guarantee compliance with the law and avoid sanctions.

The application of sanctions by the ANPD is an important instrument for the protection of personal data in Brazil. Companies must be vigilant in complying with the legislation to avoid the risk of administrative sanctions.

By: Juliana Bloise

Civil Law | CPDMA Team

Return

Recent posts

The STJ decides that stock options (option to purchase shares or quotas) cannot be seized.

On November 5th, the 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice ruled, through the judgment of REsp 1841466[1], under the rapporteurship of Minister Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, on the impossibility of seizing stock options. The case focused on the possibility of a third party exercising the right to purchase shares in […]

Read more
Governance in family businesses: essential structures and instruments

Corporate governance in family businesses has been gaining increasing relevance in the Brazilian business landscape, where approximately 90% of companies are family-controlled. The lack of adequate planning for business succession and the difficulty in maintaining harmony in family relationships often lead to the company’s failure […]

Read more
Resolution No. 586/2024 of the CNJ and the Future of Agreements in Labor Justice

On 09/30/2024, the National Council of Justice (CNJ) unanimously approved Resolution No. 586 through Normative Act 0005870-16.2024.2.00.0000, which regulates the agreement between employee and employer in the termination of the employment contract, through approval by the Labor Justice system, with full settlement of the contract. In other words, […]

Read more
The Legitimacy of Associations and Foundations to Request Judicial Reorganization and the New Stance of the STJ.

At the beginning of October, the 3rd Panel of the STJ, by majority vote, issued a decision in four special appeals (REsp 2.026.250, REsp 2.036.410, REsp 2.038.048, and REsp 2.155.284), ruling against the active legitimacy of nonprofit foundations to request Judicial Reorganization. This unprecedented decision appears, at first glance, […]

Read more
Government of RS Establishes Recovery Program II: Installment Plan for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection

The Government of the State of Rio Grande do Sul has instituted the Recovery Program II through Decree No. 57,884 of October 22, 2024, with the objective of allowing the installment of tax and non-tax debts for entrepreneurs or business entities under bankruptcy protection, including taxpayers whose bankruptcy […]

Read more
Renegotiation of BRL 60 Billion in Debt for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection Regularized by PGFN

With information from Valor Econômico newspaper. Original article link: http://glo.bo/3NOicuU Since 2020, the Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN) has been advancing negotiations to regularize debts of companies under bankruptcy protection, resulting in the renegotiation of approximately BRL 60 billion. The number of regularized companies has tripled, reaching 30% of cases, thanks to a more collaborative approach from the […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram