Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 19 de September de 2023
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Pseudonyms and well-known nicknames and trademark registration - the Didi case

Imagem ilustrativa do artigo de Vanessa Soares sobre o caso Didi.

Didi has not lost the right to use his character's name.

The news at the moment is that actor Renato Aragão has lost the right to use the DIDI trademark to Chinese company Beijing DIDI Infinity Technology.

So let's get to the clarifications. 

The Chinese company, best known for owning the 99 mobility app, has registered the DIDI trademark on its own and DIDI plus other elements in the most diverse segments and in the most diverse classes for both products and services, ranging from electric vehicles, computer programs, online advertising and publicity, insurance consultancy and financial information, passenger transport, security services, food such as meat, fruit, eggs, milk, beer, juice and water, liqueurs, wines and sparkling wines, organization of exhibitions for cultural purposes, television broadcasting; among others. 

Renato Aragão, better known as Didi, "the creator and the creature", can't afford to lose a trademark he never had. The DIDI trademark was never registered by the actor on his own. Had he registered it, it would have appeared in the INPI database, even if it had been extinguished or archived. He even registered the DIDI trademark, inserted into the titles of the films, television programs and entertainment services in which he acted, but DIDI alone he never registered. 

The trademarks "AS AVENTURAS DO DIDI" and "DIDIZINHO" are currently in force in the name of RENATO ARAGÃO PRODUÇÕES ARTÍSTICAS LTDA., both for television programs, communication, radio broadcasting, publications, albums and school materials. The trademarks "A TURMA DO DIDI" and "DIDI E O SEGREDO DOS ANJOS" are also in full force, but under the ownership of Rede Globo - which does not prevent them from being transferred to Renato. 

However, DIDI is a character created by the actor, which came to be his pseudonym and, being a character, is protected by copyright, which is independent of registration. The Industrial Property Law Law 9.279/96article 124 (XVI) also establishes that pseudonyms, notoriously known nicknames and artistic names cannot be registered as trademarks, except with the owner's consent. 

In this way, DIDI, or Renato, can make use of the character's name in artistic works such as television programs and plays.

By: Vanessa Pereira Oliveira Soares

Intellectual Property | CPDMA Team

Return

Recent posts

The STJ decides that stock options (option to purchase shares or quotas) cannot be seized.

On November 5th, the 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice ruled, through the judgment of REsp 1841466[1], under the rapporteurship of Minister Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, on the impossibility of seizing stock options. The case focused on the possibility of a third party exercising the right to purchase shares in […]

Read more
Governance in family businesses: essential structures and instruments

Corporate governance in family businesses has been gaining increasing relevance in the Brazilian business landscape, where approximately 90% of companies are family-controlled. The lack of adequate planning for business succession and the difficulty in maintaining harmony in family relationships often lead to the company’s failure […]

Read more
Resolution No. 586/2024 of the CNJ and the Future of Agreements in Labor Justice

On 09/30/2024, the National Council of Justice (CNJ) unanimously approved Resolution No. 586 through Normative Act 0005870-16.2024.2.00.0000, which regulates the agreement between employee and employer in the termination of the employment contract, through approval by the Labor Justice system, with full settlement of the contract. In other words, […]

Read more
The Legitimacy of Associations and Foundations to Request Judicial Reorganization and the New Stance of the STJ.

At the beginning of October, the 3rd Panel of the STJ, by majority vote, issued a decision in four special appeals (REsp 2.026.250, REsp 2.036.410, REsp 2.038.048, and REsp 2.155.284), ruling against the active legitimacy of nonprofit foundations to request Judicial Reorganization. This unprecedented decision appears, at first glance, […]

Read more
Government of RS Establishes Recovery Program II: Installment Plan for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection

The Government of the State of Rio Grande do Sul has instituted the Recovery Program II through Decree No. 57,884 of October 22, 2024, with the objective of allowing the installment of tax and non-tax debts for entrepreneurs or business entities under bankruptcy protection, including taxpayers whose bankruptcy […]

Read more
Renegotiation of BRL 60 Billion in Debt for Companies Under Bankruptcy Protection Regularized by PGFN

With information from Valor Econômico newspaper. Original article link: http://glo.bo/3NOicuU Since 2020, the Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN) has been advancing negotiations to regularize debts of companies under bankruptcy protection, resulting in the renegotiation of approximately BRL 60 billion. The number of regularized companies has tripled, reaching 30% of cases, thanks to a more collaborative approach from the […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram