Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: April 5, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Revenue must follow 29 Carf precedents

The Ministry of Economy attributed binding effect to 29 precedents of the Administrative Council of Tax Appeals (Carf). The measure, provided for in Ordinance No. 129, obliges the federal tax administration - which includes the Federal Revenue Service and the National Treasury Attorney General's Office (PGFN) - to follow the body's understandings, even if favorable to taxpayers.

The precedents pacify the administrative court's understanding of certain tax matters. They are edited after several trials in the same direction. They are only mandatory for the board members. However, with the binding effect, this obligation is extended to inspectors and attorneys.

Of the body's 128 precedents, 107 are binding. In June 2018, binding effect had already been granted to 65 statements. The status can avoid the application of tax assessments that would be overturned in Carf.

Of the 29 that have now gained binding effect, 16 are favorable to taxpayers, according to lawyer Carlos Navarro, a partner at Viseu Advogados. For him, the bond is commendable. "The binding effect is good for everyone," he says.

In addition to taxpayers not receiving assessments, adds the lawyer, Carf has fewer cases on the agenda and the judges of the first administrative instance - from the regional trial precincts (DRJs) - do not need to analyze issues that will be overturned in the body.

Even with Carf's summaries, there are still cases in which inspectors do not follow the body's understanding, according to lawyer Felipe Kneipp Salomon, from Levy & Salomão Advogados. The binding effect is important, he says, because not all taxpayers take the matter to administrative litigation.

The ordinance, adds the lawyer, brings matters that could have already become binding in 2018. One of them is Precedent No. the addition of the late payment fine, before the start of the tax procedure. "This issue is already peaceful," says Salomon.

In a note to Valor, the PGFN states that it already promotes its link to the precedents of Carf, regardless of the attribution of binding effectiveness by the minister. Since the PGFN Ordinance No 502, of May 12, 2016, it adds in the text, the body does not present challenges or appeals on a topic on which there is a statement by Carf - the measure is prohibited by the Judging Body's Internal Regulations.

Source: Beatriz Olivon via Valor Econômico.

Return

Recent posts

Thomas Dulac Müller discusses third-party liability in bankruptcy at TMA Brasil event in Porto Alegre

On March 18, 2025, at the Hotel Laghetto Stilo Higienópolis, Thomas Dulac Müller, a lawyer and expert in corporate restructuring, participated in the panel "Third-Party Liability in Bankruptcy", sharing his expertise alongside top industry specialists. The discussion provided strategic insights into the legal implications of bankruptcy for third parties involved in insolvency proceedings. […]

Read more
State Government launches Refaz Reconstruction: public notice for negotiation of ICMS debts

The Refaz Reconstruction (Decree 58.067/2025) will allow the regularization of debts with the State Revenue Service and the State Attorney General's Office (PGE) for companies owing ICMS, with a reduction of up to 95% in interest and fines. The initiative aims to reduce an ICMS debt stock of R$ 55.2 billion in the state. Currently, about 72% of this amount is in the judicial collection phase, […]

Read more
PGFN Launches Public Notice No. 4/2025 for the 2nd National Tax Regularization Week

The Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN) has published Public Notice No. 4/2025 for the execution of transactions during the 2nd National Tax Regularization Week, aiming to provide beneficial conditions for the regularization of debts registered in the Union’s active debt, with amounts equal to or lower than R$ 45 million. The public notice will be available from March 17 to March 21, and applications must be made exclusively through the REGULARIZE website.

Read more
Atualização da NR-1: sua empresa está preparada?

Atualização da NR-1 do MTE - muito além de uma obrigação: boas práticas de gestão de riscos ocupacionais demonstram boa-fé para com os stakeholders[1] vinculados à empresa e permitem que esta se destaque no mercado competitivo por sua governança em conformidade com os preceitos normativos. A Norma Regulamentadora nº 1 (NR) é uma norma do Ministério do […]

Read more
Assessment of Entitlements in Partial Dissolution of a Company: Legal and Practical Aspects

The dissolution of a company is a highly relevant topic in Corporate Law. Whether total or partial, the withdrawal, exclusion, or death of a partner can generate conflicts among those involved, especially regarding the assessment of entitlements to be paid to the withdrawing or excluded partner or their successors. The Civil Code provides general guidelines […]

Read more
The Full Bench of the Superior Labor Court (TST) established 21 binding theses on Monday (02/24), consolidating itself as a Court of Precedents.

Como forma de pacificação da jurisprudência consolidada junto aos Colegiados do TST, as teses firmadas deverão ser observadas pelos Tribunais Regionais do Trabalho. Nesta toada, a Resolução 224/2024 acrescentou dispositivos na IN 40/2016 do TST, prevendo o cabimento de Agravo Interno contra decisões dos Tribunais Regionais do Trabalho que negarem seguimento a Recurso de Revista nos casos em que o […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram