Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 7 de July de 2023
Posted by: CPDMA Team

STF declares 11 items of the drivers' law (Law 13.103/2015) unconstitutional

Imagem de um volante de de caminhão com as mãos de um motorista.

The trial of the Direct Unconstitutionality Action (ADI) 5322, filed by the National Confederation of Land Transport Workers (CNTT) against the Trucking Law, is over (Law 13,103/2015)the law that regulates the exercise of the driver's profession in road transportation activities of cargo and passengers has undergone significant changes. Among them is the authorization to extend the workday by up to 12 hours, the exclusion of the waiting period from the workday, the fractioning of the interday break, as well as the requirement to take a toxicology test.

The ministers of the Supreme Court (STF), in a vote with 8 votes in favor and 3 against, decided to overturn the provisions of the Truck Drivers Law (Law 13.103/2015) that address the working day, rest and fractioning of the break for drivers. The vote of the rapporteur, Minister Alexandre de Moraes, prevailed. According to him, the entire period at the driver's disposal should be considered a workday, including the waiting time for loading and unloading the truck.

Meal, rest and rest breaks are excluded from the workday. Furthermore, drivers will not be allowed to rest while the vehicle is in motion, even when two drivers take turns. It will be mandatory that the rest must be taken while the vehicle is parked. The break between workdays must be 11 consecutive hours within a 24-hour work period, and it is forbidden to split the break or to coincide it with a mandatory stop while driving the vehicle.

Additionally, drivers must take a weekly rest period of 35 hours every 6 days, and they are not allowed to accumulate rest periods in order to use them when returning home.

The justices Marco Aurélio, Nunes Marques, Gilmar Mendes, Luís Roberto Barroso, Luiz Fux and Cármen Lúcia followed the vote of the reporting justice, Alexandre de Moraes. Justice Dias Toffoli followed the rapporteur, with reservations.

On the other hand, Justices Ricardo Lewandowski, Edson Fachin and Rosa Weber differed, because in addition to the 11 items considered unconstitutional by Justice Moraes, they highlighted other points. Lewandowski, for example, understood that the provisions that deal with the labor relationship of the Independent Cargo Transporters (TAC) are unconstitutional. It is worth noting that Justice Lewandowski is already retired and voted before he left the court.

Undoubtedly, the STF's decision will have a great impact on the road transport sector, since the unconstitutionality of the provisions of the Truckers Law will lead to an increase in the cost of transportation in the country. This will occur because it will be necessary to hire more drivers and, moreover, the daily driving time will be reduced, impacting productivity and the mileage traveled per day. In addition, it will be necessary to provide a structure for weekly rest outside the company's base, due to the scarcity of rest areas on the highways.

Labor Law | CPDMA Team

Return

Recent posts

Lease agreements: attention to the deadlines of the Transitional Regime under the Tax Reform

The Tax Reform, provided for in the Federal Constitution (art. 156-A), in Complementary Bill No. 108/2024, and in Complementary Law No. 214/2025, had as its main goal to transform the consumption taxation system in Brazil. Five complex taxes were eliminated — PIS, Cofins, IPI, ICMS, and ISS — which will be replaced by […]

Read more

STJ upholds acquisition for any price in the 3rd round of the bankruptcy auction and rejects claims of an unfairly low price

A Terceira Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) proferiu uma decisão de grande impacto no Direito Empresarial e Processual, validando a arrematação de um imóvel de massa falida por apenas 2% de sua avaliação. Esta decisão é fundamental e reforça a prioridade da Lei de Falências (Lei nº 11.101/2005, atualizada pela Lei nº 14.112/2020) […]

Read more
New STJ ruling: protection for co-owners in cases of attachment and auction of indivisible assets

Em recente julgamento (REsp 2.180.611-DF), a Terceira Turma do STJ estabeleceu um entendimento crucial que visa proteger o patrimônio do coproprietário ou cônjuge, em caso de penhora e arrematação de bens indivisíveis, que não tem responsabilidade pela dívida (o alheio à execução). O que mudou e o que você precisa saber? A lei (Código de Processo Civil - […]

Read more
Selic is the applicable interest rate for late payment in civil debts, rules the STJ

O Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) firmou um importante entendimento no Tema Repetitivo 1368 sobre a taxa de juros de mora aplicável a dívidas de natureza civil no Brasil, antes da vigência da Lei n.º 14.905/2024. --- A tese firmada: o STJ estabeleceu que o artigo 406 do Código Civil de 2002 (em sua redação anterior à Lei […]

Read more

Rural sale-and-leaseback: liquidity for companies in crisis and protected returns for investors

No agronegócio brasileiro, a busca por capital rápido em meio à escalada dos juros fez crescer uma estrutura já conhecida no mercado imobiliário urbano: o sale-and-leaseback. A lógica é direta: o produtor vende a área rural a um investidor, recebe o dinheiro à vista e, no mesmo ato, assina um contrato de arrendamento a longo prazo […]

Read more
CVM lança o regime FÁCIL para ampliar o acesso de empresas de menor porte ao mercado de capitais

Em 3 de julho de 2025, a Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM) publicou as Resoluções CVM 231 e 232, instituindo o regime FÁCIL (Facilitação do Acesso ao Capital e Incentivos às Listagens). A iniciativa visa simplificar o ingresso de Companhias de Menor Porte (CMP) no mercado de capitais brasileiro, promovendo transparência regulatória e estabilidade jurídica, […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram