Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: 7 de July de 2023
Posted by: CPDMA Team

STF declares 11 items of the drivers' law (Law 13.103/2015) unconstitutional

Imagem de um volante de de caminhão com as mãos de um motorista.

The trial of the Direct Unconstitutionality Action (ADI) 5322, filed by the National Confederation of Land Transport Workers (CNTT) against the Trucking Law, is over (Law 13,103/2015)the law that regulates the exercise of the driver's profession in road transportation activities of cargo and passengers has undergone significant changes. Among them is the authorization to extend the workday by up to 12 hours, the exclusion of the waiting period from the workday, the fractioning of the interday break, as well as the requirement to take a toxicology test.

The ministers of the Supreme Court (STF), in a vote with 8 votes in favor and 3 against, decided to overturn the provisions of the Truck Drivers Law (Law 13.103/2015) that address the working day, rest and fractioning of the break for drivers. The vote of the rapporteur, Minister Alexandre de Moraes, prevailed. According to him, the entire period at the driver's disposal should be considered a workday, including the waiting time for loading and unloading the truck.

Meal, rest and rest breaks are excluded from the workday. Furthermore, drivers will not be allowed to rest while the vehicle is in motion, even when two drivers take turns. It will be mandatory that the rest must be taken while the vehicle is parked. The break between workdays must be 11 consecutive hours within a 24-hour work period, and it is forbidden to split the break or to coincide it with a mandatory stop while driving the vehicle.

Additionally, drivers must take a weekly rest period of 35 hours every 6 days, and they are not allowed to accumulate rest periods in order to use them when returning home.

The justices Marco Aurélio, Nunes Marques, Gilmar Mendes, Luís Roberto Barroso, Luiz Fux and Cármen Lúcia followed the vote of the reporting justice, Alexandre de Moraes. Justice Dias Toffoli followed the rapporteur, with reservations.

On the other hand, Justices Ricardo Lewandowski, Edson Fachin and Rosa Weber differed, because in addition to the 11 items considered unconstitutional by Justice Moraes, they highlighted other points. Lewandowski, for example, understood that the provisions that deal with the labor relationship of the Independent Cargo Transporters (TAC) are unconstitutional. It is worth noting that Justice Lewandowski is already retired and voted before he left the court.

Undoubtedly, the STF's decision will have a great impact on the road transport sector, since the unconstitutionality of the provisions of the Truckers Law will lead to an increase in the cost of transportation in the country. This will occur because it will be necessary to hire more drivers and, moreover, the daily driving time will be reduced, impacting productivity and the mileage traveled per day. In addition, it will be necessary to provide a structure for weekly rest outside the company's base, due to the scarcity of rest areas on the highways.

Labor Law | CPDMA Team

Return

Recent posts

Atualização da NR-1: sua empresa está preparada?

Atualização da NR-1 do MTE - muito além de uma obrigação: boas práticas de gestão de riscos ocupacionais demonstram boa-fé para com os stakeholders[1] vinculados à empresa e permitem que esta se destaque no mercado competitivo por sua governança em conformidade com os preceitos normativos. A Norma Regulamentadora nº 1 (NR) é uma norma do Ministério do […]

Read more
Assessment of Entitlements in Partial Dissolution of a Company: Legal and Practical Aspects

The dissolution of a company is a highly relevant topic in Corporate Law. Whether total or partial, the withdrawal, exclusion, or death of a partner can generate conflicts among those involved, especially regarding the assessment of entitlements to be paid to the withdrawing or excluded partner or their successors. The Civil Code provides general guidelines […]

Read more
The Full Bench of the Superior Labor Court (TST) established 21 binding theses on Monday (02/24), consolidating itself as a Court of Precedents.

Como forma de pacificação da jurisprudência consolidada junto aos Colegiados do TST, as teses firmadas deverão ser observadas pelos Tribunais Regionais do Trabalho. Nesta toada, a Resolução 224/2024 acrescentou dispositivos na IN 40/2016 do TST, prevendo o cabimento de Agravo Interno contra decisões dos Tribunais Regionais do Trabalho que negarem seguimento a Recurso de Revista nos casos em que o […]

Read more
STJ and the Validity of the Discount for Labor Creditors: Our Role in the Concreserv Case

The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has begun the trial of a crucial issue for business law and judicial recovery in Brazil: the possibility of applying a discount on labor claims and creating subclasses within this category. The case under review involves the judicial recovery of the company Concreserv, which established a 90% discount on amounts exceeding 25 […]

Read more
Salary Transparency Report – Submission Deadline until February 28, 2025

Companies with 100 or more employees can now submit information for the Salary Transparency Report from February 3 to February 28, 2025, through the Emprega Brasil portal, in the employers' section. On the portal, companies must report whether they have a job and salary plan or a career plan, policies to encourage the hiring of women (such as Black women, women with disabilities, victims of violence, heads of households, and LGBTQIA+), actions to promote women to management and leadership positions, programs to support the sharing of family responsibilities, as well as the salary criteria for career progression.

Read more
Commercial Registries Now Require Publications of Corporate Acts: Understand the Changes

In recent months, several Commercial Registries in Brazil have begun requiring the publication of acts related to mergers, spin-offs, and incorporations of companies, as established in the Civil Code (Articles 1,122 and 1,152, §1) and the Corporate Law (Articles 227, §3, 228, §3, and 229, §4). Although these obligations were already stipulated by law, many […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram