Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo

CPDMA BLOG

Category:
Date: February 26, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team

STJ allows fixing of success fees after withdrawal of the party

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) determined the arbitration of successful fees to lawyers even after the party withdrew from the case. According to the collegiate's understanding, the unilateral and unjustified termination of the contract with a success clause by the client constitutes abuse of the right. The Court's decision was unanimous and was based on the vote of the rapporteur, Minister Nancy Andrighi.

The matter was judged in an action originating from the Court of Justice of the State of Tocantins (TJTO). According to the file, the party signed a contract with a success clause with the lawyers. That is, he would only have to pay the fees if he won the action. After 15 years without trial, however, the client withdrew from the process and terminated the contract with the lawyers, who filed a lawsuit to claim the fees.

In the first instance, the claim was granted, but the decision was reversed in the Court of Justice. The defenders appealed to the STJ through REsp 1,724,441, on the grounds that even if the contract only provided for payment at the end of the process, in case of success, the unilateral termination modified the contractual relationship. In this way, payment would be due to the defenders.

The lawyers asked that the fees be arbitrated in 20% of the value of the case or determined by the court of origin. The rapporteur of the case, Minister Nancy Andrighi, responded to the second request, being unanimously accompanied by the 3rd Panel.

For her, “it is undeniable that the contract for the provision of legal services signed with a success clause is anchored in a true relationship of trust, to the extent that, if the risks initially assumed by the parties are linked to the final result of the judgment, there is an expectation right that the bond between them lasts until the termination of the process, which, evidently, presupposes a duty of fidelity established between the lawyer and his client”.

On February 21, the Special Court analyzed the possibility of setting fees in cases in which the party waives the action to join the tax installment program. The understanding in the collegiate, however, was in the opposite direction to that of the 3rd Panel. Due to Law 13,496/2017, the Special Court must change its position, taken by means of a repetitive appeal, which allows the payment of fees in these cases.

Source: Pedro Alves via Jota.

Return

Recent posts

Atualização da NR-1: sua empresa está preparada?

Atualização da NR-1 do MTE - muito além de uma obrigação: boas práticas de gestão de riscos ocupacionais demonstram boa-fé para com os stakeholders[1] vinculados à empresa e permitem que esta se destaque no mercado competitivo por sua governança em conformidade com os preceitos normativos. A Norma Regulamentadora nº 1 (NR) é uma norma do Ministério do […]

Read more
Assessment of Entitlements in Partial Dissolution of a Company: Legal and Practical Aspects

The dissolution of a company is a highly relevant topic in Corporate Law. Whether total or partial, the withdrawal, exclusion, or death of a partner can generate conflicts among those involved, especially regarding the assessment of entitlements to be paid to the withdrawing or excluded partner or their successors. The Civil Code provides general guidelines […]

Read more
The Full Bench of the Superior Labor Court (TST) established 21 binding theses on Monday (02/24), consolidating itself as a Court of Precedents.

Como forma de pacificação da jurisprudência consolidada junto aos Colegiados do TST, as teses firmadas deverão ser observadas pelos Tribunais Regionais do Trabalho. Nesta toada, a Resolução 224/2024 acrescentou dispositivos na IN 40/2016 do TST, prevendo o cabimento de Agravo Interno contra decisões dos Tribunais Regionais do Trabalho que negarem seguimento a Recurso de Revista nos casos em que o […]

Read more
STJ and the Validity of the Discount for Labor Creditors: Our Role in the Concreserv Case

The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has begun the trial of a crucial issue for business law and judicial recovery in Brazil: the possibility of applying a discount on labor claims and creating subclasses within this category. The case under review involves the judicial recovery of the company Concreserv, which established a 90% discount on amounts exceeding 25 […]

Read more
Salary Transparency Report – Submission Deadline until February 28, 2025

Companies with 100 or more employees can now submit information for the Salary Transparency Report from February 3 to February 28, 2025, through the Emprega Brasil portal, in the employers' section. On the portal, companies must report whether they have a job and salary plan or a career plan, policies to encourage the hiring of women (such as Black women, women with disabilities, victims of violence, heads of households, and LGBTQIA+), actions to promote women to management and leadership positions, programs to support the sharing of family responsibilities, as well as the salary criteria for career progression.

Read more
Commercial Registries Now Require Publications of Corporate Acts: Understand the Changes

In recent months, several Commercial Registries in Brazil have begun requiring the publication of acts related to mergers, spin-offs, and incorporations of companies, as established in the Civil Code (Articles 1,122 and 1,152, §1) and the Corporate Law (Articles 227, §3, 228, §3, and 229, §4). Although these obligations were already stipulated by law, many […]

Read more
crossmenuchevron-down
en_USEnglish
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram