Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: February 26, 2019
Posted by: CPDMA Team

STJ allows fixing of success fees after withdrawal of the party

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) determined the arbitration of successful fees to lawyers even after the party withdrew from the case. According to the collegiate's understanding, the unilateral and unjustified termination of the contract with a success clause by the client constitutes abuse of the right. The Court's decision was unanimous and was based on the vote of the rapporteur, Minister Nancy Andrighi.

The matter was judged in an action originating from the Court of Justice of the State of Tocantins (TJTO). According to the file, the party signed a contract with a success clause with the lawyers. That is, he would only have to pay the fees if he won the action. After 15 years without trial, however, the client withdrew from the process and terminated the contract with the lawyers, who filed a lawsuit to claim the fees.

In the first instance, the claim was granted, but the decision was reversed in the Court of Justice. The defenders appealed to the STJ through REsp 1,724,441, on the grounds that even if the contract only provided for payment at the end of the process, in case of success, the unilateral termination modified the contractual relationship. In this way, payment would be due to the defenders.

The lawyers asked that the fees be arbitrated in 20% of the value of the case or determined by the court of origin. The rapporteur of the case, Minister Nancy Andrighi, responded to the second request, being unanimously accompanied by the 3rd Panel.

For her, “it is undeniable that the contract for the provision of legal services signed with a success clause is anchored in a true relationship of trust, to the extent that, if the risks initially assumed by the parties are linked to the final result of the judgment, there is an expectation right that the bond between them lasts until the termination of the process, which, evidently, presupposes a duty of fidelity established between the lawyer and his client”.

On February 21, the Special Court analyzed the possibility of setting fees in cases in which the party waives the action to join the tax installment program. The understanding in the collegiate, however, was in the opposite direction to that of the 3rd Panel. Due to Law 13,496/2017, the Special Court must change its position, taken by means of a repetitive appeal, which allows the payment of fees in these cases.

Source: Pedro Alves via Jota.


Recent posts

Misuse of a trademark by a former partner can be recognized not only as unfair competition, but also as bad faith.

On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]

Read more
The first sanctions applied by the National Agency for the Protection of Personal Data (ANPD) were a wake-up call for companies: the LGPD is a serious law and must be complied with.

The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]

Read more
Business position on the recent STF decision that ruled that it is constitutional for trade unions to charge assistance contributions

Recently, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) unanimously ruled that unions can collect an assistance contribution, including from non-member employees, in ARE 1.18.459 (Topic 935 of the General Repercussion), as long as the worker is guaranteed the right to object, establishing the following thesis: "it is constitutional to establish, by agreement or [...]

Read more
The new chapter in the legal dispute involving the term "HELLES", registered as a 'trademark'.

Recalling the case... It all started at the beginning of 2019, when the brewery Fassbier gave extrajudicial notice to a series of breweries in Rio Grande do Sul for the alleged misuse of the term HELLES, claiming to have exclusive use of the expression, given that the word was registered as a trademark. Not satisfied with [...]

Read more
Suspension of labor executions against companies in the same economic group

In a recent decision, the STF suspended the processing of labor executions that discuss the inclusion, in the execution phase, of a company that is part of an economic group that did not participate in the knowledge process. In labor proceedings, when the execution phase is reached and the main debtor does not have enough assets to pay the debt, many [...]

Read more
STJ decides that the legal personality of a civil association can be disregarded, but limits liability to the directors

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) [1] dismissed a special appeal filed by the directors of a civil association, which had its legal personality disregarded in a case involving the improper use of a trademark. The Court, in a judgment drafted by Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze, held that the disregard of [...]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram