STJ allows fixing of success fees after withdrawal of the party

The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) determined the arbitration of successful fees to lawyers even after the party withdrew from the case. According to the collegiate's understanding, the unilateral and unjustified termination of the contract with a success clause by the client constitutes abuse of the right. The Court's decision was unanimous and was based on the vote of the rapporteur, Minister Nancy Andrighi.

The matter was judged in an action originating from the Court of Justice of the State of Tocantins (TJTO). According to the file, the party signed a contract with a success clause with the lawyers. That is, he would only have to pay the fees if he won the action. After 15 years without trial, however, the client withdrew from the process and terminated the contract with the lawyers, who filed a lawsuit to claim the fees.

In the first instance, the claim was granted, but the decision was reversed in the Court of Justice. The defenders appealed to the STJ through REsp 1,724,441, on the grounds that even if the contract only provided for payment at the end of the process, in case of success, the unilateral termination modified the contractual relationship. In this way, payment would be due to the defenders.

The lawyers asked that the fees be arbitrated in 20% of the value of the case or determined by the court of origin. The rapporteur of the case, Minister Nancy Andrighi, responded to the second request, being unanimously accompanied by the 3rd Panel.

For her, “it is undeniable that the contract for the provision of legal services signed with a success clause is anchored in a true relationship of trust, to the extent that, if the risks initially assumed by the parties are linked to the final result of the judgment, there is an expectation right that the bond between them lasts until the termination of the process, which, evidently, presupposes a duty of fidelity established between the lawyer and his client”.

On February 21, the Special Court analyzed the possibility of setting fees in cases in which the party waives the action to join the tax installment program. The understanding in the collegiate, however, was in the opposite direction to that of the 3rd Panel. Due to Law 13,496/2017, the Special Court must change its position, taken by means of a repetitive appeal, which allows the payment of fees in these cases.

Source: Pedro Alves via Jota.

Return

Recent posts

Thomas Dulac Müller discusses third-party liability in bankruptcy at TMA Brasil event in Porto Alegre

On March 18, 2025, at the Hotel Laghetto Stilo Higienópolis, Thomas Dulac Müller, a lawyer and expert in corporate restructuring, participated in the panel "Third-Party Liability in Bankruptcy", sharing his expertise alongside top industry specialists. The discussion provided strategic insights into the legal implications of bankruptcy for third parties involved in insolvency proceedings. […]

State Government launches Refaz Reconstruction: public notice for negotiation of ICMS debts

The Refaz Reconstruction (Decree 58.067/2025) will allow the regularization of debts with the State Revenue Service and the State Attorney General's Office (PGE) for companies owing ICMS, with a reduction of up to 95% in interest and fines. The initiative aims to reduce an ICMS debt stock of R$ 55.2 billion in the state. Currently, about 72% of this amount is in the judicial collection phase, […]

PGFN Launches Public Notice No. 4/2025 for the 2nd National Tax Regularization Week

The Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (PGFN) has published Public Notice No. 4/2025 for the execution of transactions during the 2nd National Tax Regularization Week, aiming to provide beneficial conditions for the regularization of debts registered in the Union’s active debt, with amounts equal to or lower than R$ 45 million. The public notice will be available from March 17 to March 21, and applications must be made exclusively through the REGULARIZE website.

Atualização da NR-1: sua empresa está preparada?

Atualização da NR-1 do MTE - muito além de uma obrigação: boas práticas de gestão de riscos ocupacionais demonstram boa-fé para com os stakeholders[1] vinculados à empresa e permitem que esta se destaque no mercado competitivo por sua governança em conformidade com os preceitos normativos. A Norma Regulamentadora nº 1 (NR) é uma norma do Ministério do […]

Assessment of Entitlements in Partial Dissolution of a Company: Legal and Practical Aspects

The dissolution of a company is a highly relevant topic in Corporate Law. Whether total or partial, the withdrawal, exclusion, or death of a partner can generate conflicts among those involved, especially regarding the assessment of entitlements to be paid to the withdrawing or excluded partner or their successors. The Civil Code provides general guidelines […]

The Full Bench of the Superior Labor Court (TST) established 21 binding theses on Monday (02/24), consolidating itself as a Court of Precedents.

Como forma de pacificação da jurisprudência consolidada junto aos Colegiados do TST, as teses firmadas deverão ser observadas pelos Tribunais Regionais do Trabalho. Nesta toada, a Resolução 224/2024 acrescentou dispositivos na IN 40/2016 do TST, prevendo o cabimento de Agravo Interno contra decisões dos Tribunais Regionais do Trabalho que negarem seguimento a Recurso de Revista nos casos em que o […]

CPDMA BLOG

STJ allows fixing of success fees after withdrawal of the party

contents

Recent posts