STJ decides that the legal personality of a civil association can be disregarded, but limits liability to the directors
The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ)  dismissed a special appeal filed by the directors of a civil association, which had its legal personality disregarded in a case involving the improper use of a trademark.
The Court, in a ruling authored by Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze, held that it is possible to disregard the legal personality of a civil association, but limited liability to the personal assets of members with management powers or capable of influencing decision-making that constitutes abuse of the legal personality.
As a rule, the institute of disregarding legal personality is applicable when abuse of personality is proven through confusion of assets or misuse of purpose, i.e. when the assets of the partners are confused with those of the legal entity or when the legal entity is used to achieve purposes for which it was not created. In these cases, the autonomy of the legal entity is allowed to be removed and the assets and rights of the partners themselves are affected. This is known as the Major Theory of Disregarding Legal Personality, which is set out in article 187 of the Civil Code.
Although it is an institute commonly used to resolve disputes in Brazilian courts, its application is generally restricted to legal models of companies, mainly limited liability companies, with few studies and judgments on its applicability to associations, foundations and corporations.
Thus, by deciding on the matter and recognizing the applicability of the disregard of legal personality in the case of civil associations, the STJ is helping to broaden the understanding and improve the technique for its effective use, avoiding conflicting decisions in other instances.
In his opinion on the applicability of the disregard of legal personality in the case of civil associations, Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze was clear in differentiating the type of relationship that the partner and the associate have, respectively, with the company and the association, thus underpinning the difference in treatment between the disregard of legal personality in one case and the other.
In his vote, the Justice stated that when the legal personality of a company is disregarded, what is achieved is a corporate contract, which binds its members in terms of obligations - with a strong personal element. In the case of associations, on the other hand, there is a legal agreement between the association itself and its members (and not between the members themselves) - there is not the same obligatory link.
Thus, there is a difference between the position of command occupied by some members and mere membership of the association, and it is unreasonable to extend the patrimonial liability that results from the disregard of the legal personality to the personal assets of a large group of members who did not participate in the acts that led to the sanction being applied.
The following excerpt is taken from the vote, which summarizes and defines the decision:
"Thus, the disregard of the legal personality of a civil association is admissible, but the liability must be limited to the members with management power or capable of influencing the decision that constitutes the abuse of the legal personality."
The decision thus seeks to ensure reasonableness and limit its effects to the assets of those who effectively act and have decision-making power over the association's course. It is these associates, members of the association's management or administration, who effectively gave rise to the applicability of disregard - whether through confusion of assets or misuse of functions - who will be personally liable for the damage they cause.
Therefore, this judgment serves as a warning to administrators and managers of civil associations, since they are the ones most affected by the recognition and application of the institute to the association. It is up to managers to ensure faithful compliance with the requirements governing the institution's legal personality, avoiding any decision that could lead to confusion of assets or misuse of functions and, consequently, direct liability for any damage.
On February 14, the newspaper "Valor Econômico" published an article in which it was pointed out that the São Paulo Court of Justice had recognized unfair competition in the improper use of a trademark by a former partner. The article, however, does not give the number of the case in which it would be possible to analyze more details of the decision, but it does inform that the individuals had signed a [...]
The General Personal Data Protection Law - Law No. 13,709/18 (LGPD) was published in 2018 and came into force in 2020. This deadline was given to public and private legal entities (processing agents) that collect, store or process the personal data of individuals, in Brazil or abroad, in order to [...]
Recently, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) unanimously ruled that unions can collect an assistance contribution, including from non-member employees, in ARE 1.18.459 (Topic 935 of the General Repercussion), as long as the worker is guaranteed the right to object, establishing the following thesis: "it is constitutional to establish, by agreement or [...]
Recalling the case... It all started at the beginning of 2019, when the brewery Fassbier gave extrajudicial notice to a series of breweries in Rio Grande do Sul for the alleged misuse of the term HELLES, claiming to have exclusive use of the expression, given that the word was registered as a trademark. Not satisfied with [...]
In a recent decision, the STF suspended the processing of labor executions that discuss the inclusion, in the execution phase, of a company that is part of an economic group that did not participate in the knowledge process. In labor proceedings, when the execution phase is reached and the main debtor does not have enough assets to pay the debt, many [...]
The 3rd Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ)  dismissed a special appeal filed by the directors of a civil association, which had its legal personality disregarded in a case involving the improper use of a trademark. The Court, in a judgment drafted by Justice Marco Aurélio Belizze, held that the disregard of [...]
Advertising cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant advertisements and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors to websites and collect information to deliver personalized advertisements.