Cesar Peres Dulac Müller logo


Date: April 14, 2022
Posted by: CPDMA Team

Musical parodies do not need to mention the author of the original work, decides STJ

Musician and vocalist singing to illustrate the matter related to the STJ on musical parodies.

a few days ago the STJ published the result of a judgment promoted by the Court, which discussed the need to mention the author of the original work when making and disseminating a parody, in the light of copyright. 

The Superior Court of Justice granted the Special Appeal filed by Rádio e Televisão Bandeirantes (BAND), overturning the judgment of the São Paulo Court of Justice that had sentenced the broadcaster to pay R$ 10 thousand, as moral damages, to the author of music that had a parody of his work aired on the broadcaster's program, without credit being attributed to him as the author of the original work.

The author of the work maintained before the Supreme Court the claim for damages in the allegation of plagiarism of his music, which was not accepted. The understanding of the STJ, unanimously, was in the sense that the broadcasting of parody by the broadcaster does not infringe the copyright of the original creator, since the parody must be considered as an unpublished artistic work, a new intellectual creation that results from the transformation of a work previous. Therefore, the copyright on the parody would belong to its own creator, with no mention of the author of the inspiring work, not even alleging plagiarism.

Parody is a kind of reformulation of the original work, using comic terms or puns. The “new” music is made in a funny or educational tone and, as stated in art. 47 of the Copyright Law (Law No. 9.610/98), are free, as long as it is not a mere reproduction of the original work and does not imply discredit, and there is no need for prior authorization from the author. Typically, parodies use a familiar tune assigned to a new lyric.

The parody cannot, however, be confused with the music version. The broadcasting of a music version, without prior authorization, finds an obstacle in art. 46, item I, item “a”, of the Copyright Law. In the version, few changes are made to the music, taking advantage of a good part of the original work and, therefore, it is necessary to obtain prior and express authorization from the author of the musical work.

Intellectual Property - CPDMA


Recent posts

Get to know the “brand” asset class

Continuing with our series of posts explaining the differences between the classes of intellectual assets, today we're going to talk about the TRADEMARK. A trademark is a sign used to distinguish and identify a product or service. It is registered with the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), guaranteeing the owner exclusive use in [...]

Read more
Intellectual property gives the author, inventor or holder of knowledge the power to protect their rights.

Intellectual property gives the author, inventor and/or owner of the protected knowledge the power to protect their rights, and can, for example, prohibit third parties from producing, using, selling or importing their invention, as well as preventing the reproduction or imitation of their trademark, in addition to guaranteeing exclusivity to the owner of the creation [1] (ARAÚJO; BARBOSA; QUEIROGA; ALVES, 2010). [...]

Read more
In the best CPDMA tradition of hospitality, our new office in São Paulo is ready for your visit

The business law support your business is looking for, with the distinctive CPDMA service you deserve. Strategically located in the heart of Itaim Bibi, one of São Paulo's most vibrant financial centers, CPDMA's branch is located at Rua Bandeira Paulista, 716, suite 31/32. For more information or to schedule a visit, please contact [...]

Read more
The risk of not being aware of a brand's changes

A marca de azeites portugueses GALLO aproveitou a proximidade da Páscoa e anunciou uma modificação na forma de apresentação da marca e do rótulo de seus produtos. Segundo o diretor de marketing da empresa, Pedro Gonçalves, a nova identidade visual foi inspirada em uma lenda sobre a origem da marca. Ele relata que em 1919, […]

Read more
The protection afforded to highly renowned trademarks

In recent weeks, news has been circulating on legal websites that the Federal Court has annulled a registration for the "CHEVETTE DRINK" trademark. The registration, with a nominative presentation, was considered annullable for infringing article 124, item VI, of the Industrial Property Law (LPI), which prohibits the registration of signs of a generic nature, commonly used for [...]

Read more
Electronic Judicial Domicile: companies must register by May 30

Large and medium-sized companies [1] across the country will have until May 30, 2024 to voluntarily register with the Electronic Judicial Domicile, a tool of the Justice 4.0 Program that centralizes information and communications about cases in Brazilian courts. After this deadline, registration will be compulsory, starting [...]

Read more
linkedin Facebook pinterest youtube lol twitter Instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter Instagram